Photo by Vince Fedoroff
HOMEOWNER RECEIVES ORDER – Marius Moustakas, of 1312 Centennial St. (above), went before Yukon Supreme Court Justice Ron Veale this morning. He was told to cease all unlawful activities on the property.
Photo by Vince Fedoroff
HOMEOWNER RECEIVES ORDER – Marius Moustakas, of 1312 Centennial St. (above), went before Yukon Supreme Court Justice Ron Veale this morning. He was told to cease all unlawful activities on the property.
A Porter Creek homeowner has been ordered to stop any illegal activities on his property while waiting for the courts to decide whether he should be evicted over suspicions of bootlegging.
A Porter Creek homeowner has been ordered to stop any illegal activities on his property while waiting for the courts to decide whether he should be evicted over suspicions of bootlegging.
Marius Moustakas, of 1312 Centennial St., was in front of Yukon Supreme Court Justice Ron Veale this morning.
The Department of Public Safety and Investigations is seeking to evict Moustakas from his house for 90 days.
This is the first such action under the Safer Communities and Neighbourhood Act (SCAN) calling for the temporary eviction of a homeowner.
The main request for eviction will not be heard in court until July. In the meantime, Veale ruled that there was a "reasonable inference” that the property was being used habitually for the consumption or sale of liquor in contravention of the Liquor Act.
The judge also ruled that the activities were adversely affecting the community.
Veale issued an interim order prohibiting Moustakas or anyone else on the property from participating in the illegal activity.
The judge also told Moustakas he must do everything possible to prevent the activities from recurring on the property.
Moustakas, who has yet to retain a lawyer, agreed to follow the order.
Court documents show SCAN investigators received a complaint Dec. 30, 2011, alleging bootlegging was occurring at 1312 Centennial. The house is situated at the corner of Centennial and Fourteenth Avenue, across from the Garden Centre.
After contacting the Yukon Liquor Control Corp., staff at the Whitehorse liquor store reported irregular purchasing patterns by one customer, and subsequently went back through purchase records and video footage.
The documents noted that video surveillance of the property was set up.
Over 87 hours from Feb. 16 to Feb. 20, there were 70 visits to the home, the vast majority lasting between four and five minutes, say the documents.
There were 86 visits, most of the same length, between Feb. 27 and March 5.
Since the legislation was enacted in 2006, the SCAN office has taken 59 actions, including 30 warnings and 29 evictions of rental properties with the assistance of the landlord.
This is the first eviction attempt involving a homeowner.
SCAN allows officers to built a fact-based case that doesn't need to meet the same legal test as a criminal case, but allows the court the breathing room to make obvious assumptions based on such things as the number of visitors and when they're visiting.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (3)
Up 0 Down 0
flyingfur on May 23, 2012 at 8:18 am
Josey: The SCAN legislation in the Yukon is just like the SCAN legislation in just about every other province and territory in Canada. The SCAN officers are the civil arm of this enforcement, as opposed to the criminal arm (cops). Perfectly legal; it's be tried, tested, and challenged in the courts...nothing half-assed about what they did. Marius was in court too and would have had an opportunity to say he did not think it was right since he himself drank all that booze ($2000 a month would mean he'd need to down a 60 ouncer a day) and the pills too, not to mention explain all the visitors at all hours of the night and day. I'm certain Marius' neighbours have a different opinion of how this went and whether it was "flawed" or not. I hope they also bring criminal charges against him.
Up 0 Down 1
Judith White on May 23, 2012 at 4:52 am
Really? The process requires that a person first go to court and have a judge tell them to stop doing things that are illegal? Wonder what that cost in court time. No darn wonder so many people think our justice system is a joke.
Up 0 Down 0
Josey Wales on May 22, 2012 at 12:55 pm
True or not true...the last paragraph of this story should trip alarm bells in your head.
You need not the same legal criteria... but based on a "factual" assumption (WTFE)....they can smear you in public post photos of your home all before any convictions of any kind?
Yeah OK ...because the courts are known for lots of common sense decision making. (don't even get me started)
This dude may very well be the dude they claim he is...but really folks, does this process not seem flawed?