Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Coun. Ranj Pillai and Coun. Dave Stockdale

‘Complete polarization' seen on fowl issue

Whitehorse could soon be home to some fowl residents after Monday evening's city council meeting.

By Stephanie Waddell on July 10, 2012

Whitehorse could soon be home to some fowl residents after Monday evening's city council meeting.

Second and third readings of the new Animal Control Bylaw were passed, permitting local residents to have up to six hens on their property.

In voting with the rest of council to allow the hens, provided owners meet certain conditions, Coun. Dave Stockdale backed off on his proposal last week to have a referendum on the matter as part of the Oct. 18 municipal election.

The birds can now fall under the nuisance animal category if there are problems, and those looking to keep chickens will need approval from 60 per cent of their neighbours within a three-metre radius.

Given those safeguards, Stockdale said, he doesn't believe a general vote on the matter is needed after all.

It would "take forever” to organize a referendum, he said, adding it would also be complicated and likely end in the same split result.

The citizens' survey this year found 48 per cent weren't in favour of chickens being permitted in residential areas, while 41 per cent said they were in favour.

The remaining residents surveyed made other comments on the situation.

"It is a complete polarization,” Coun. Ranj Pillai said of the issue.

He hopes the city has met both sides of the argument in the middle, with the regulation that more than a majority of property owners in the area agree with a proposal to keep chickens.

He also said he wants the public to understand the decision to go ahead with the change was not an easy one given the nearly 50/50 split in opinions.

Those who have made presentations to the city on the matter have argued backyard hens promote local food production, and that the manure is excellent for compost.

Meanwhile, those opposed to the idea argue the birds are too noisy and draw predators such as foxes to the neighbourhood.

While the regulations governing chickens fall under the Animal Control Bylaw, it was through the city's Zoning Bylaw rewrite that a number of residents proposed being permitted to have chicken coops.

The city then looked at making the changes to the Animal Control Bylaw with regulations governing how the coops will be built, how to deal with manure, the number of hens allowed and so on.

At last night's meeting, council passed amendments so that roosters will not be allowed to be kept.

If a chick is found to be a rooster, the owner must get rid of it. The regulation was put in after concerns were expressed over the excessive noise the male birds often make.

It had initially been proposed that birds be at least four months old before they are purchased so the sex would be known.

That was changed when it was pointed out at a public hearing that it would be expensive and put stress on the bird to ship it after the age of four months.

Instead, at the first sign of a chick being a rooster, the owner must get rid of it.

Those found to be breaking the regulations around chickens could be fined $75, and the permit allowing for the hens could be revoked.

Coun. Florence Roberts said she was glad to see the city planning to take action if there is a problem.

Also changed in the bylaw are the limits around dogs and cats.

Where the bylaw previously permitted dogs and cats on a per residence basis, they are now limited on a per property basis to account for garden suites and the like.

Comments (10)

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Jul 14, 2012 at 7:05 am

People who want to keep chickens as pets, shouldn't need any more 'permission' than any other pet owners. If any pets become a nuisance there are existing regulations to deal with it.

Those who want to keep chickens should form an 'Urban Poultry Association', get their chickens, and tell bylaw to 'go-pound-sand' just like the ATV and snowmachine riders do.

I would think that our limited bylaw force has more important things to do with their time than to end up with "egg-on-their-faces".

Up 0 Down 0

Akimajuktuq on Jul 13, 2012 at 7:40 am

I have no problem with chickens in yards in town kept by responsible owners. For the most part dogs are ok because they must be controlled. Cats on the other hand...

To those arguing that more wildlife will be drawn into the city due to chickens in yards: nonsense. There are already plenty of tempting treats (garbage, cats, dogs)so chickens aren't going to make any difference.

Neighbours should not have any say whether one can get chickens or not. IF the chickens become a problem, then they have a say; not before.

Up 0 Down 0

C.J. on Jul 13, 2012 at 5:41 am

Welcome to Whitehorse, Wayne.

Up 0 Down 0

Wayne on Jul 12, 2012 at 10:01 am

What? More people opposed than for,

so we pass the bylaw? Again, what?

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Jul 12, 2012 at 9:39 am

The same stringent regulations should be applied to dogs or any other domestic pets inside the City. From what I've seen, dogs can be a much bigger problem in every way as compared with chickens.

This seems to be a clear case of "My annoying pet is OK but yours is not." Such 'double standards' have no place in a rational society.

Up 0 Down 0

June Jackson on Jul 11, 2012 at 12:10 am

I had a couple of concerns about keeping chickens.. one.. are coops going to draw even more wild life into the city? How much does a coyote have to weigh to drag off a 4 year old child?

Another concern was slaughtering and selling. I feel the handwriting is on the wall for that.. next there will be some whining bag up in council saying..my neighbors are begging for fresh eggs..we should be allowed to sell at least 6 or 8 or a dozen.. that will get a yet.. but.. in order to satisfy demand..we need more chickens.. I am also concerned about the filth of slaughter.. if they aren't allowed to slaughter them but they want their bird for sunday dinner.. ???

Personally..I feel we haven't heard the end of this.. also.. city council.. jeez.. there was a 7% difference in people opposed and people for.. that's not a tie..

Can I keep a pig? I have a really nice mud hole in my yard,, it would make a nice slop.

Up 0 Down 0

CMZ on Jul 10, 2012 at 2:43 pm

Densifying so that people live in closer quarters calls for more regulations about how they live together that way. A greater degree of sensitivity is needed, not less.

Nine feet does seem extreme, until you remember how small these lots are becoming, and how setbacks have been reduced to the point of meaninglessness.

It's ironic that people who are very likely to claim that they support densification seem to expect that they should also live as they like in those crowded neighbourhoods, without regard to the impact their choices may have on the quality of life of the people around them. There's a real disconnect there.

The shame of the great chicken debate of 2012 is that it's distracting from some more serious planning regulations that people won't pay attention to until they're living with the results. Why, it's almost like it was planned that way.

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Jul 10, 2012 at 1:04 pm

Give it a go, and let's see if these problems crop up or not. The law can be changed again if it turns out that this was a mistake. From my experience staying with friends in Alaska, I think it is going to be fine. With them, I did not even know they had chickens until one day someone went out the door with a bowl of vegetable peelings 'for the chickens'. I was saying, "What chickens? You guys have CHICKENS? Where are they?" They were right on the other side of the driveway, across from the side entry to the kitchen. Many times I had walked by their small fenced pen (size of a 10x10 chain link dog kennel), and their hen house, (which looked like a small storage shed except nicer: wood exterior, painted blue). I never once heard a noise, smelled a smell, or experienced drama of foxes attacking. I went into the hen house to visit them and they cocked their heads and looked at me silently, then continued softly clucking, settling themselves into their little boxes, walking, eating, drinking, and that's it! That is what hens do! They were very sweet animals.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Jul 10, 2012 at 9:44 am

Thomas, no error. Just the usual logic or lack there of from our soon to be unemployed Mayor & council.

Mind you with anything built under the hairdressers watch, with her density fetish, that 9 feet is wasted space...next council's infill I guess.

Flying over this town, and reading how we are out of land here. Complete lunacy!

Bears in town feasting on compost bins they see as lunch boxes (and should), any guesses as to how long before coyotes and foxes will so too join them eating hens?

I guess that fine crew never watched Bugs Bunny.

It will be nice to see a new round of entitlement pulling up to the trough post civic election.

....As at least, the Buck stops there!

Up 0 Down 0

Thomas Brewer on Jul 10, 2012 at 8:31 am

FTA: "approval from 60 per cent of their neighbours within a three-metre radius."

Really? Nine feet? Please tell me this is an error.

Also, why not throw in the actual number of pets now allowed per property. Thanks

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.