Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

CHICKEN DELIGHT – Riverdale resident Christina Calhoun stands before her chicken coop last fall before her hens were evicted by the city for non-compliance of city bylaws. As promised by city hall, a new provision for the allowance of back yard chickens as a local food source is proposed in the revised Animal Control Bylaw currently under review.

Advocate pecks away at plan's perceived flaws

Allowing for backyard chickens is great, but the city needs to loosen its knickers when it comes to the regulations, council heard Monday night.

By Chuck Tobin on May 30, 2012

Allowing for backyard chickens is great, but the city needs to loosen its knickers when it comes to the regulations, council heard Monday night.

Riverdale resident Christina Calhoun told council she does not have a problem with the limit of six hens, nor the prohibition against the noisier roosters.

But when it comes to the proposed age limit, it's completely unnecessary to require all hens on the property be more than four months old so bylaw officers can make sure they're girls and not really boys, Calhoun said.

When somebody orders laying hens, they come that way.

She said insisting chicken droppings be treated the same as dog poop and disposed of in the household waste container and not in the compost bin simply does not make sense.

Dog poop, like cat poop and people poop, is waste that needs to be disposed of. Chicken manure, conversely, is among the best compostable products on the planet, and highly sought after for use in gardens, Calhoun told council.

She said restricting the height of back yard chicken coops to two metres is inconsistent with restrictions for sheds and garages.

Given the interior wall height would be much lower than two metres, Calhoun added, it gets hard on the back when you try to get in there and clean.

Preventing the sale of extra chicken eggs or chicken manure for composting could be seen as a barrier to an alternative but minimal source of revenue, and particularly hard on families who could benefit from selling a dozen eggs here and there, Calhoun said.

She suggested providing neighbouring property owners with a veto over whether she can have chickens is right on the edge.

"I do not feel your neighbour has a right to say ‘no,'” Calhoun told the members of council. "I know my neighbours would not, but I do not feel my neighbour should have the ability to say ‘no.'

"I can't say ‘no,' you can't have a dog, or a cat, or an ATV.'”

Coun. Dave Stockdale noted the proposed changes under the Animal Control Bylaw are still very much under review and open to public discussion.

City council approved first reading of the bylaw that includes the back yard chicken regulations. Second and third readings are scheduled for July 9.

A handful of proposed changes to the Animal Control Bylaw have been dovetailed to go forward with the massive overhaul of the city's Zoning Bylaw, the revised version of which also received first reading Monday night.

A public hearing into the new zoning provisions, which are sweeping in nature, is scheduled for June 25, at which time council will also be receiving input on the chicken regulations.

Calhoun kick-started the whole discussion about permitting back yard chickens when she came forward last year after learning she was in contravention of the city bylaw by raising her laying hens.

Though she lost her bid to keep her chickens pending a review of the bylaw, city hall did promise a review and has subsequently recommended hens be allowed.

Coun. Florence Roberts was the only member of council to offer up any defence of the proposed regulations.

Allowing for the disposal of chicken manure in the composting bin could send mixed messages. It could also confuse the issue of whether it's OK to place regular pet feces in the composting bin, the councillor said.

She suggested the two-metre height limit works well with the two-metre height limit for back yard fences, and the intent of the bylaw is not to create a market for eggs.

Right now, said Roberts, the intent is to open the door for residents who want to raise chickens to provide a food source for personal use.

Calhoun pointed out that under peak production, a family could generate two or three dozen eggs a week from their six hens, which are most productive from eight or nine months old to two years, or three years at best.

What would be wrong, she wondered, with selling extra eggs to a neighbour, particularly for a family would could use a little more, however much more?

What would be wrong, Calhoun asked, with selling a hen for soup once she's past her prime, or making a deal with the neighbour who wants chicken manure for his garden?

She said when she was unknowingly living on the other side of the law in Riverdale, she used to barter with neighbours who were more than happy to make a deal.

Raising chickens in the back yard is by no means a commercial venture, but once in a while there may be a little extra to go around, Calhoun suggested.

Comments (10)

Up 0 Down 0

Yukoner73 on May 31, 2012 at 11:06 am

To "the problem is people":

Beautifully said!

People love to whine and moan, makes me crazy.

Nice to see someone throw a bit of rationality into the mix.

Up 0 Down 0

the problem is people on May 31, 2012 at 7:08 am

The aroma of 10,000 families cooking dinner permeates the entire city every night, not to mention garbage that sits in 20,000 containers for a week at a time and you people are worried about a few chickens attracting predators??? Have you been attacked in your driveway when carrying groceries into your house? And how about all those outdoor barbecues with fresh chicken on the grill, should they also be banned? Quick, better ban humans from the city because they attract wildlife...

There is no way chicken clucking is going to drown out barking dogs let alone the sound of traffic and all the other human made ruckus that goes on. And no point in moving south to a big city, most allow chickens and all have wildlife. Perhaps what some people really need is a big plastic bubble over their lives.

Make sure coops are built to standards that will withstand predators. Only people are stupid enough to try the same locked door over and over expecting free lunch every time.

Up 0 Down 0

Yukon Resident on May 31, 2012 at 4:37 am

Instead of 5 or 6 chickens, can I have a cow? They are relatively quiet when alone. I can sell the milk to my neighbors. I'm sure nobody will have a problem with it.

Up 0 Down 0

Joel on May 31, 2012 at 4:36 am

And we all know that dogs and cats in town have added to the coyote and fox populations so adding chickens will be way too much. This to add to all those same animals coming in for compost bins!

Plain laid eggs have been eaten for hundreds of years. Safety should be the least of anyone's concerns. I do agree they should not be able to be sold. Make a deal with some neighbors to buy feed or clean the pen and trade for eggs or meat rather than trying to sell them..

Max, the reason for the hens in due to the fact they make very little noise, unlike the dogs and cats in your neighborhood.

Up 0 Down 0

Then What? on May 31, 2012 at 3:55 am

Ok, First it is Chickens, then what is next? Ducks, geese, oh I like beef, can I save money and raise my own cow in my back yard? Oh wait Pork is better, how about one or two pigs? I feel chickens should not be kept in town, but that is just my opinion, it now sits in the City's hands....Good luck with that!

Up 0 Down 0

Yukoner73 on May 30, 2012 at 11:43 pm

...yes because as we ALL know, in the Yukon, domestic chickens are the fox and coyote's natural prey. So with the hundreds and HUNDREDS of chicken coops popping up all over town soon, we'll no doubt be over-run with foxes and coyotes...not to mention all the chicken feathers cluttering up the sewer drains...damn. Time to move I suppose.

LOL!

Up 0 Down 0

JaymanC on May 30, 2012 at 11:10 pm

Wow, where to start with this one. First chickens in town, will bring wildlife(foxes, coyotes, wolf, bears) into the city just setting a plate for them in your backyard. Hear come feast on these and other pets that may be wandering around. Second, wants to sell eggs to neighbours. How do you check for quality and consistency, are you selling eggs that are safe for people to eat. Pelly Farm Eggs they check their eggs and inspect them before they sell them, are you going to make sure they are safe for people to eat? I think they should be moved out of town. What is going on with our city's planners and decision makers, they have have lost their minds! I think we need to put people who know what they are doing in their positions because these ones we have now have shown they don't know what they are doing at all.

Up 0 Down 0

Max Mack on May 30, 2012 at 10:13 am

Anonymous is right in expressing concern about the proposed bylaw's impact on predator populations. There will be an increase in foxes, coyotes and wolves (and perhaps bears) as a result.

Also . . .

In addition to the many dogs around my neighbourhood that are almost constantly barking, I may now have to listen to the incessant clucking of chickens. Not to mention the wonderful aroma of chicken scat!

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on May 30, 2012 at 9:22 am

Good input for amendments to the proposed legislation. I agree that chicken manure is different from cat and dog crp. It belongs in the compost, not the garbage can. I would not push the issue of legalizing sales of spent hens and eggs. Hey, if your neighbour wants to slip you five bucks, fly at it, but I could see some issues with potential advertising and so on. Then again, I have certainly seen farm gate sales of eggs and no one seems any worse for the wear. But do not push too much, maybe. This is not about commercial production. I agree that if it is decided that chickens are okay in town under specified rules, no neighbour should have the right to veto. That flies in the face of the beliefs of the community. I think that if someone is following the rules, they should not be penalized just because one uptight person can't wrap their heads around progress.

Up 0 Down 0

Anonymous on May 30, 2012 at 8:09 am

I see a real problem with having wildlife moving into town if we start having chicken coops in town. Just look at the incident with the coyote at the Canada Games Centre. Having chicken coops will most likely attract more coyotes and foxes I believe.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.