Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for October 27, 2009

‘It’s silly, careless, random acts of vandalism’

The City of Whitehorse’s new anti-vandalism policy could see inmates cleaning up graffiti and planting trees.

By Justine Davidson on October 27, 2009 at 3:38 pm

photo

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

SIGNS OF URBAN LIFE – This sign commemorating the creation of the Trans-Canada Trail was recently graced by a graffiti artist’s spray can`, obliterating many of the names and facts associated with the Whitehorse section of the trail. Upkeep of the sign is the responsibility of the Klondike Snowmobilers’ Association. The City of Whitehorse is trying to get rid of all the graffiti on city property and is hoping other property owners will follow suit.

The City of Whitehorse’s new anti-vandalism policy could see inmates cleaning up graffiti and planting trees.

Every year, the city spends about $100,000 fixing benches, repainting walls and even replacing scorched porta-potties – property that has been destroyed or disfigured by vandals.

For homeowners, that represents 0.5 per cent of their property taxes.

For all residents, it comes from the general coffers of whichever department’s property has been vandalized, usually parks and recreation.

Up to now, the city has taken a primarily reactive approach to vandalism.

However, with the introduction of a new graffiti removal policy, the city is switching gears to proactive, says Doug Hnatiuk, Whitehorse’s projects and community development co-ordinator.

The new policy sets up a priority timeline for graffiti removal, with high-profile buildings such as the Canada Games Centre getting cleaned up within a day of being tagged.

Also on the day-one list are any racial slurs or otherwise offensive language sprayed on to city property.

To supply manpower to the effort, the city is planning to hire inmates from the Whitehorse Correctional Centre to do some of the work, as it did with the recent cleanup of Kishwoot Island.

It used to be that graffiti was removed an a complaint-driven basis, Hnatiuk explained, but now it will be dealt with as soon as it is spotted by city workers.

Once the city has caught up with removing all the existing graffiti, it plans to blank out any new graffiti within three days of its appearance.

The task will get $70,000 worth of city funds in the next fiscal year. After 2010, the amount will drop to $10,000 a year to maintain the program.

“We’re hoping that by being proactive in this way, it will prevent further vandalism,” Hnatiuk said.

Though the city will only be removing or painting over graffiti on its own property, Hnatiuk said he hopes other residents and business owners will follow the example and quickly remove any evidence of vandalism from their own properties.

At the same time, he said, he also hopes the people doing the vandalism will smarten up and stop defacing things that are there for everyone’s benefit. Broken memorial benches are what baffles him the most, he said.

“I’m bewildered why someone would want to do damage to something that’s been donated to all residents for their enjoyment.

“... Typically it’s silly, careless, random acts of vandalism.”

Some of the recent vandalism costs released by the city include:

• removal of graffiti in parks and public areas, including the new Hamilton Boulevard extension: $22,000

• replacement of broken trees in parks on boulevards: $10,000

• repair and replacement of public fixtures such as lamp posts and memorial benches: $10,000

• replacement of stolen city property: $8,000

• repair of city playgrounds due to arson and other vandalism: $7,000

• replacement of burned three portable toilets: $3,000

• clean up after bush parties: $3,000.

CommentsAdd a comment

Trevor F

Oct 27, 2009 at 4:10 pm

There is a simple solution here.  Charge and convict the taggers.  Part of their sentence should be to remove every single tag of theirs in addition to a few hours removing the tags of others.

Offer a reward for people to rat out the taggers.  For a 500 or 1000 dollar reward you’d have the phones ringing off the hook.  Tax payers wouldn’t be footing the bill but rather the dullards who perpetrate these eyesore.

We’ll see how serious the courts are about this wanton destruction of public and private property is when that idiot ‘Sonic’ appears in court November 4th.  He alone is probably responsible for at least $100,000 in damage considering his tag is on every street corner in the city.  I didn’t see him making any effort to cleanup his tags since he was arrested which isn’t surprising given that his kewl ‘tag’ clearly demonstrates his diminished mental capacity.

bobby bitman

Oct 27, 2009 at 4:34 pm

Why not start with that jerk who called himself ‘Sonic’ and wrote all over several dozen downtown buildings over the past few years?  He was caught but his name was not published.  I want more information on that young man, he was 18 years old.

I’d like to see ‘Sonic’ out there scrubbing off the private properties he and his cohorts have defaced.  For the next few years as new grafitti crops up, Mr. Sonic should be hauled out to clean up, as we property owners had to clean up after him.

Yes, I did clean up my own building which he painted his name on, in gold paint.  I had to cover it with primer and re-paint, but you can still see the damage to the siding.  I’d sure like to meet this sneaky little coward, and I’d like to see him out there in public doing what I had to do:  Cleaning up after grafitti.

Vlad Petrlak

Oct 28, 2009 at 2:05 pm

Dear Justine Davidson, you are naive if you think that this “proactive” approach will smarten up those doing that. You do not deal with normal people, but rather with some primitive idiots. The only way is to catch them lock them up and let them pay for what they do. And,if they are juvenile make they parents pay that. Good day - Vlad

bobby bitman

Oct 28, 2009 at 4:48 pm

Trevor, thank you for the information that the vandal who wrote Sonic on my building will be in court on November 4.  Can’t wait to see him.

Do you know his name?  He was reported as being 18 years old, so this is public information, but for some reason the article in the newspaper did not report it.  That guy cost me money and time and permanently defaced my property.  And he did it in a sneaky, cowardly way.  Now I want to know who he is, where he lives, and what is going to be done to reimburse me for my time, money and the partial destruction of my faith in trying to invest in this town.

Goose

Oct 28, 2009 at 6:31 pm

Tagging is ugly, im not sure what thrill they get out of this nonsense.  If i see people doing it, i call the rcmp and follow them till they are dealt with.  Cmon taggers, buy some paper, dont destroy the city with your garbage

Arlene Logan

Oct 30, 2009 at 4:45 pm

I am “Sonic’s” mother. I wish to express my sincerest apologies to those whose property was damaged by my son. I also apologize to all those who have had to walk down the street and view his ‘work’. I am not going to make any excuses for his behavior, nor am I going to defend him in any way. He is an adult and I hope and pray he will be dealt a fair punishment for his acts of vandalism, and I hope it will include restitution. I live in Edmonton and my son is living with his father. I just learned on October 28, what has happened. I would just like those who have been hurt by his actions to know that his mother does care about what he does. I do not condone in any way the wanton destruction he has caused. I understand your anger and frustration. I only ask that when you face him in court next week, you provide him an opportunity to make amends for the damage he caused.

Don McKenzie

Oct 31, 2009 at 11:14 pm

Maybe Whitehorse might want to follow what the city of Edmonton is doing in regard to grafitti.  Also, when “Sonic” is convicted, SUE HIS ASS, in small claims court, for every bit of damage he has done. If he has no money left to buy spray ...  Also sue his parets, if it can be found that he tagged your building before his 18th birthdaty Make THEM pay for their responsibility.  And ast, who’s bright idea was it to call them ‘ATISTS”?  They are VANDALS.  Nothing more.

Tim in Ottawa

Nov 3, 2009 at 4:51 pm

The vandals could be easily identified and eventually caught if someone would simply call the police or CrimeStoppers.

Most of these taggers practice their crimes somewhere before defacing public property(school books etc) so someone has seen them somewhere before.

Maybe if photos of the more common tags were published, someone would ID the guilty people.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview