Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

BACK TO SCHOOL – Premier Darrell Pasloski (back row, second from left) and Yukon Party MLAs and candidates for the Nov. 7 election gathered at Jack Hulland Elementary School early this morning to announce plans to make schools more energy-efficient.

Yukon Party pledges to energy retrofit 20 schools in territory

Yukon Party pledges to energy retrofit 20 schools in territory

By Sidney Cohen on October 14, 2016

A re-elected Yukon Party government would spend $47 million on retrofitting 20 Yukon schools to make them more energy-efficient, Premier Darrell Pasloski vowed today.

The goals of this proposed investment are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions caused by burning oil for heat, to bring down the cost of heating Yukon schools, and to create new jobs, said Pasloski.

“And the best part of this plan is no carbon tax.”

Pasloski made the announcement in front of a handful of Yukon Party candidates outside Jack Hulland Elementary School in Porter Creek.

“It’s only the Yukon Party that’s 100 per cent opposed to a carbon tax in the North,” said the premier.

“We’re looking for solutions that will reduce emissions, that will create work for Yukoners and will keep our taxes low. That has always been our goal.”

Some of the renovations the Yukon Party promises to fund include updating insulation in walls and roofs, and installing high-efficiency windows.

The plan also includes upgrading heating systems and ventilation recovery systems, and installing new, energy-efficient lighting. The party estimates these renovations can be done for $45 million.

In addition to structural upgrades, a Yukon Party government would spend an estimated $2.15 million on fitting solar panels onto Yukon schools that aren’t hooked up to the hydro grid.

Burwash Landing would not get solar panels because renewable energy in that community is already at “full capacity,” according to a Yukon Party statement issued this morning.

Work on these retrofits would begin next summer, said Currie Dixon, an outgoing cabinet minister and the Yukon Party’s campaign chair.

“The reality with working on schools is you have to do it in summers, because that’s when the kids aren’t there,” he said.

Audits, however, which would identify energy inefficient schools and determine the renovations they need, could begin “immediately,” he said.

These audits are estimated to cost about half a million dollars and have already been factored into the total funding commitment, he added.

The Yukon Party estimates that these investments would save the government about $2.36 million a year in energy spending, and bring down yearly electricity use by about 121,000 kilowatt hours.

When all is said and done, the party believes these retrofits will reduce Yukon schools’ annual emissions by about 3,900 tonnes.

“This is a nine per cent reduction in Yukon Government’s annual GHG emissions,” the Yukon Party said in a statement.

Pasloski continues to oppose a carbon tax in the Yukon and has refused to accept that one is coming.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said all provinces and territories will start paying a minimum, $10-per-tonne price for carbon in 2018.

Still, the premier remains confident that an exemption for the North is possible.

“Yukoners want to do their part to fight climate change; what we’re saying is a carbon tax doesn’t work in the North,” he told reporters this morning.

“We can actually reduce our emissions without making everything cost more money and actually create jobs at the same time and keep our taxes low.”

As for which schools would benefit from the Yukon Party’s proposed upgrades, Pasloski said that would be determined by the Climate Change Secretariat and the Departments of Highways and Public Works and Education.

Pointing to Jack Hulland Elementary behind him, Pasloski said it would cost about $2 million to do an energy audit and retrofit, but that it would save the school an estimated $94,000 annually in fuel and reduce emissions by 141 tonnes.

Would the Yukon Party’s proposed $47 million investment mean funding cuts in other areas?

The premier said, “No.

“We invest capital all the time, every year... we’re committed to this,” he said.

A Yukon Party government would petition Ottawa for funding assistance, but the $47-million promise to schools is not contingent upon help from the federal government.

“We committed this amount, we’ll do these projects either way, but we hope that Canada will be interested in partnering with the Yukon government because we have a shared goal in reducing emissions,” said Dixon.

The government has already requested federal funds to help with retrofitting Yukon schools, but it has yet to hear a response, he said.

If federal funding doesn’t come through, the renovations will “probably take a little bit longer,” said Dixon.

The Yukon Liberals also held a news conference this morning to map out their plans for a renewable energy future. See full coverage in Monday’s Star.

Comments (25)

Up 1 Down 1

Arturs on Oct 20, 2016 at 5:58 pm

The Liberals have been suggesting this for a decade now. It's nice to have that acknowledged finally!

Up 0 Down 0

BnR on Oct 20, 2016 at 5:23 pm

Wilf, what on earth are you babbling about now?

Up 5 Down 2

Petronius on Oct 20, 2016 at 3:03 pm

North of 60 opined too much in those last comments, where to start. What the heck it doesn't matter because the conservatives are gonna lose, lose and lose.

Up 18 Down 5

rusty on Oct 19, 2016 at 10:29 am

It's a real shame that it takes an election year for promises like this to be made.

Up 13 Down 9

JG on Oct 19, 2016 at 9:25 am

the CONservatives aren't fooling anyone this time around, I can only feel sad for Sandy and his team when they take over and are left with the mess left behind, but I know they will do good.

Up 6 Down 3

Oya on Oct 19, 2016 at 8:04 am

@ Bewildered... "I challenge others to be upfront about their allegiances." Is that why you're using the name Bewildered instead of your own name?

Up 6 Down 14

Yukon Party has concrete actions on Oct 18, 2016 at 12:21 pm

Words but no action will not gain any votes. Negative talk turns people off.

Up 10 Down 24

north_of_60 on Oct 17, 2016 at 10:10 pm

@Petronius opined: "The conservative party had 14 years to retrofit."

...and that's what they've been doing every year for the past 14 to improve the energy efficiency of government buildings. The government plans to speed-up the retrofit schedule. It's a much more effective way to save energy cost and reduce carbon emissions than any CarbonTax.

Up 15 Down 22

Liberal following the YP plans on Oct 17, 2016 at 9:47 pm

Liberals are following the Yukon Party platform and don't have one of their own.

Up 21 Down 13

WastelandKave on Oct 17, 2016 at 9:30 pm

@Bewildered are you sure that Paz did his research? Wouldn't be the first time a project was rushed through without a needs assessment... However, I do give him credit for admitting he bases his opposition to carbon tax on common sense rather than studies or analysis. Bold move sir, but I prefer evidence based policy decision making. For the record, I'll be voting Liberal this election. Sandy Silver for Premier!!

Up 27 Down 11

Joe on Oct 17, 2016 at 6:14 pm

10 years in power, let all the buildings get run down and now use their repairs as an election promise.....YP has got to go.

Up 38 Down 16

Petronius on Oct 17, 2016 at 10:12 am

The conservative party had 14 years to retrofit. The public sees through this cheap ploy to buy votes. Maybe they can donate their severance pay and show some real commitment? Ya right.

Up 15 Down 10

Fed up Yukoner on Oct 16, 2016 at 7:27 pm

I can see reducing heating costs by $94,000 a year but doubt if that would be the case but seriously, Jack Hulland school has 141 tonnes of emissions?? in a year? 10 years? I call bull pucky.

Up 16 Down 32

Bewildered on Oct 16, 2016 at 7:01 pm

I support the YP. I challenge others to be upfront about their allegiances. On this announcement; great. I suspect the research has been done and there is a real plan to implement this, not just empty grandiose comments. If it was done in a 'rush' I suspect you would all be wailing about procurement problems (oh wait you are). Vote someone else in and wait for 2-3 years of 'consultation' and 'research' with nothing being actually done. 2 weeks in and I am already half asleep. Have the Liberals actually put out any document with a 'number'? Have the NDP provided any statement on how much debt they will need to incur? I'm waiting.

Up 30 Down 13

Mark Sanders on Oct 16, 2016 at 6:23 pm

What a cynical attempt for a few votes.

Up 38 Down 17

June Jackson on Oct 15, 2016 at 9:07 pm

I wouldn't believe the Yukon Party if they said they sky was blue.. except for, if they said "we're going to jack up our salaries and DOUBLE our severance packages"..oh wait..they already did that.. ok.. if they said "You know that golf course?" Darn..they already did that.. maybe if they said.. "We're going to take this to court" hmmm they already did that too..not once..not twice..but.. how many times now anyway have the YP been in court fighting the people that elected them? Anyone play soccer?

Time go get out of town with the YP.

Up 23 Down 12

yukonlibby on Oct 15, 2016 at 1:00 pm

Lost in the Yukon - the great thing about being the Premier is that you're in government - and the head of it even! So you're not actually using government resources inappropriately when you quote government reports, imagine that!

Up 22 Down 34

It is to bad BNR could get her facts correct on Oct 15, 2016 at 12:23 pm

Carbon tax has driven up the cost of everything in the BC. Carbon emission are still going up in BC
BC does not have the best economy Ontario does by far.
Upgrading buildings helps our communities, our economy and the private sector job market.
This carbon is going to add up to triple tax on fuel Yukoners purchase. There will be a tax at the refinery, again when it is hauled and again when it is sold retail.
The local liberals just do what Ottawa tells them to do.
Federal liberals don't care about the north or you BNR or me or anyone else.
Strangely GST was good for Canada. It is fair and levels the tax playing field. Harmonization is even better.
Don't worry the liberals or NDP will put on a sales tax in the Yukon to go with the carbon tax.

Up 25 Down 16

north_of_60 on Oct 14, 2016 at 6:06 pm

About half of the carbon released into the atmosphere by human activities comes from Asia where factories are churning out cheap solar panels, wind turbines, and all the other disposable consumer goods we love to buy at MalWart. Those factories and the generating plants that power them are burning dirty coal and spewing the pollution into the air and water and across the land.

If the 'carbon tax' was actually about significantly reducing 'carbon emissions', then it would be applied to products imported from countries that cause the most 'carbon emissions' wouldn't it? That would give countries with strong environmental regulations a market advantage.

Because of those strong environmental regulations Canadian oil and gas provides energy with only a fraction of the toxic pollution caused by Asian coal. Using less Canadian petroleum and buying cheap solar panels and wind turbines from Asia is counterproductive and actually increases toxic pollution and those GHG emissions that some people believe cause the weather to change.

The CarbonTax is a Canadian fuel tax surcharge. It's a tax grab that won't reduce GHG emissions. The CarbonTax has not reduced GHG emissions in BC or anywhere else it's been tried.

Energy retrofits reduce GHG emissions, CarbonTaxes do not.

Up 34 Down 11

Kevin J Mellis on Oct 14, 2016 at 5:11 pm

and in comes the wonderful election promises that could have, and should have, been suggested or completed years ago!

Up 47 Down 4

Dan Davidson on Oct 14, 2016 at 4:52 pm

As I noted in a memo to the Yukon Party this morning, there isn't a school in Burwash Landing. Hasn't been for years.

Up 50 Down 19

BnR on Oct 14, 2016 at 4:38 pm

How many years at the reigns and now they decide to retrofit?
Our territorial government buildings have been falling apart due to the YPs priority on new infrastructure rather than O&M. O&M isn't sexy like ribbon cutting on new buildings, but decreased maintenance gets you buildings that are falling apart. If the YP is so concerned about energy efficiency, why did Cathers axe the energy code supplement to the National Building Code?

Up 40 Down 23

LIBERALS ONLY PARTY TO OPPOSE GST on Oct 14, 2016 at 4:15 pm

Yukon Party (Lawsuit Party) is constantly lying about the carbon tax. You are either a little slow or just uninformed if you believe any of what they are saying.

1. They keep saying that they are the only ones OPPOSED to it or FIGHTING for Yukoners, but this is just a simple play on words because the truth is that they can't stop it!! They want to trick Yukoners into thinking they can somehow stop the carbon tax by voting for the Lawsuit Party. Then If they do get elected, the carbon price will be put into place but it won't be a broken promise because they never said they WOULD stop it just that they would try, knowing full well they could never do it.

2. They say it would be horrible for the economy! Well BC currently has the best economy in the country and guess what? They have a carbon tax 3 times higher than what would be imposed here! They also have a lot of remote and northern communities who are doing just fine. This whole fear mongering thing is really getting old.

3. Their cute little building retrofitting program is a good step but is no where near what is required to reduce our GHG.

I think the Liberals should make outlandish promises to TRY and do something. Perhaps they can promise to scrap the GST, after all it is just as likely as stopping the carbon tax.

Up 50 Down 26

Lost in the Yukon on Oct 14, 2016 at 4:03 pm

So it is relatively obvious that the Pharmacist has used Government Resources to come up with his estimates, sat on that information and done nothing to these schools and simply waited until the election call to announce doing something they were already obligated to do. Do you have no ethics Mr. Pharmacist? Do you even know the word?

Up 24 Down 14

ralpH on Oct 14, 2016 at 3:36 pm

Gosh!! now we will not get the retro fits.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.