Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

SOBERING WORDS – Annika E. Nilsson (left), a senior research fellow with the Stockholm Environment Group, and Gail Fondahl (right), a professor of geography at the University of Northern British Columbia in Prince George, B.C., address Arctic parliamentarians Wednesday in Whitehorse.

‘We can’t drink money; we need the water’ was a key message to delegates

A pair of academics stressed environmental challenges at a gathering of Arctic parliamentarians Wednesday in Whitehorse,

By Christopher Reynolds on September 11, 2014

A pair of academics stressed environmental challenges at a gathering of Arctic parliamentarians Wednesday in Whitehorse, suggesting governments are not doing enough to stem climate change or encourage sustainability.

Annika E. Nilsson, a senior research fellow with the Stockholm Environment Group, said the Far North is being hit disproportionately hard by rising temperatures and their repercussions.

“We know without doubt that the impact of climate change is going well beyond what might be expected from past experiences of natural fluctuation,” she said.

Climate change repercussions include melting sea ice, morphing habitats and more temperamental weather that can result in forest fires and mid-winter thaws, Nilsson noted.

Toxic chemicals from around the globe, meanwhile, “tend to accumulate where it’s cold” and in fat-heavy northern animals — and thus the humans who eat them. This reduces the amount of available drinking water and viable hunting grounds, among other implications, she cautioned.

“We can’t drink money; we need the water.”

Speaking to the parliamentarians Wednesday afternoon, Nilsson added that serious discussion of climate change and environmental issues was “conspicuously absent in the discourse here over the last couple of days, considering the impact it will have.”

She stressed their pivotal role in the debate: “You sit between the local and the global.”

Her remarks came during the closing day of the 11th Conference of Parliamentarians of the Arctic Region, held at the Kwanlin Dun Cultural Centre.

Gail Fondahl, a professor of geography at the University of Northern British Columbia in Prince George, B.C., noted that climate change could have a disproportionate impact not only on the North, but within it.

“It matters where you are and who you are in terms of how you experience these challenges.”

Fondahl called “sustainable mining” an “oxymoron ... because sustainability is about re-use.”

Fondahl’s address carried an portentous undertone. “Be prepared for changes and be prepared for surprises,” she warned.

The conference, which occurs every two years among the eight member nations of the Arctic Council as well as indigenous governments and observer states, wrapped up with a collective conference statement.

It included a pledge to support the development of renewable energy “suitable for the Arctic region to drastically reduce black carbon emissions.”

The conference also stated it would encourage governments to ensure development of natural resources “is based on principles of sustainability” and “closer co-operation on challenges related to oil drilling and transportation of oil and other hazardous goods in Arctic waters.”

The politicians also vowed to promote use of renewable resources and continue to identify “particularly vulnerable Arctic areas that require special management to secure biodiversity.”

The conference delegates are sightseeing in the Haines Junction-Kluane National Park area today.

Comments (3)

Up 2 Down 5

Josey Wales on Sep 14, 2014 at 8:09 am

We cannot eat studies either, jobs are required to help garnish our tables with food.
Getting lectured by academia on how to best live our lives to avoid the bogeyman, the same fear based ideals that fund NGO's and academia very well.

The planet will be fine, we however for a myriad of reasons may not be.
I wish they would sell their snake oil better and shift the focus to the real issue, "we" may be hooped.
Personally I feel the planet, the critters on said planet and the fauna will rejoice when we destroy our means to live on it.
A big cosmic reset would be nice, nicer if we were outta the equation...yup...ALL of us. Give the land back to the critters, THAT is a land claim I'd support in principle, not monetarily as we are currently doing.

Up 10 Down 3

Local Drifter on Sep 13, 2014 at 2:52 pm

But we can pay for all of our goods and services with water though right? Oh wait..

Up 9 Down 7

June Jackson on Sep 12, 2014 at 7:27 pm

I wish I had thought of "can't drink money", its certainly something the Canadian government needs to hear. I think the average Canadian is intensely interested in the environment and willing to implement ecological measures.. but the Federal Government seems to slough off most of its obligations to environmental safety.

Ryan won't be there long enough to make change..but write him anyway..I'm going to.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.