Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Photo Submitted

NO-HUNTING CORRIDOR PROPOSED – This grizzly bear is seen foraging along the Tagish Road in the summer of 2013. The wildlife management board is proposing a corridor along several highways prohibiting grizzly bear hunting in the spring. Star photo by RHONDA GLENN

Proposed ban wouldn’t go far enough: critic

A ban on hunting grizzly bears in the spring along a specific network of highways is being suggested by the Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board.

By Chuck Tobin on October 31, 2014

A ban on hunting grizzly bears in the spring along a specific network of highways is being suggested by the Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board.

The board is advancing the proposal for numbered highways in the Southern Lakes district, for the Haines Road and for a 351-kilometre stretch of the Alaska Highway.

Killing bears in highway ditches has been the subject of a passionate and divisive debate for many years.

Many argue it’s their right as a hunter while others suggest it’s unethical and an affront to those who favour opportunities to watch wildlife.

The management board’s proposal was released for public review this week, following a lengthy and emotional public discussion on the issue which involved a full community tour early this year.

In a letter forwarded to Environment Minister Currie Dixon last spring, the board recommended the specific proposal be taken out for further public review, as part of the regular process the board uses to gather input on suggested changes to the Wildlife Act and its regulations.

Dixon agreed.

Harvey Jessup, vice-chair of the management board, told the Star Thursday the board intends to collect public feedback next month through the regular public meetings it hosts on proposed regulation changes, along with written correspondence.

The intent, he said, is to finalize a formal recommendation for the minister’s consideration at the management board’s meeting in December.

Jessup said the issue of roadside hunting for bears has been a difficult one for members of the board.

They’ve listened to what they’ve heard, and at this time they felt the ban should apply to grizzly bears only, and not black bears, and should be limited to the spring, and not include the summer and fall seasons, he said.

Jessup said what the board heard through its community tour earlier this year was primarily a concern focused on grizzly bears in the spring which are attracted to the fresh vegetation that grows along highways after they emerge from their dens.

The focus, he insisted, was grizzly bears and the spring time.

“We had ideas from A to Z,” he said of the input received. “So what we did was we came up with an idea, and what we said is, ‘here is a compromise.’

“And what we are saying to the public is, ‘what do you think of this idea?’

“... We are being blunt about it. We know it is a compromise, and it is not going to make everybody happy.”

Jessup said the final recommendation to the minister may or may not differ from the proposal the board is seeking input on.

An online survey on the management board’s website was posted Thursday, and had already received 28 responses as of this morning.

The proposal would prohibit hunting grizzly bears in the spring inside a 30-metre corridor on both sides of the highway, measured from the centre line.

It would apply to the Alaska Highway from Johnson’s Crossing to the Slims River Bridge west of Haines Junction; the Atlin Road to the B.C. border; the Tagish Road from Jakes Corner to Carcross; the South Klondike Highway from the Alaska border to the Carcross Cutoff; and the Haines Road, from Haines Junction to the Alaska border.

Most recently, the issue over the right to hunting bears in highway ditches raised public retaliation after a grizzly was shot a couple of years ago along the Tagish Road.

It was said to be an annual favourite among locals who would take the drive just to see and watch the bear.

In last April’s public meeting in Whitehorse, 80 or so Yukoners attended, in what was more or less a 50-50 split between those who supported and those who opposed a roadside hunting ban for bears.

The right to hunt for food was argued, particularly for those who are not able to get into the outback.

Many emphasized the pleasure they take in viewing wildlife, and the value it creates for the tourism industry.

The Yukon Fish and Game Association and its 800 to 900 members is steadfastly opposed to any no-hunting ban, unless there is a need for conservation, and the association’s executive director emphasized that position again this morning.

Gord Zealand said if there is a need to conserve a wildlife population, the fish and game association will be the first to do whatever it can to help.

If there is no need for conservation, there should be not prohibition, he said.

“We do not support a wholesale roadside ban like this, the association would not support it.”

Zealand said if there is a specific area that needs protection, then close that particular area, but the association does not support a wholesale ban.

The proposal for a 30-metre corridor on each side of the highway from the centre line also poses an issue, because if a hunter wants to shoot a bear, they’ll just wait for the bear to be 35 or 40 metres from the centre line, he said.

“It’s not going to work.”

Atlin Road resident Ken Gabb, on the other hand, said the management board’s proposal falls far short of where it needs to be.

A bear is a bear, whether it’s a grizzly or black, and it doesn’t matter if it’s spring, summer or fall, there should no shooting bears in the ditch, period, he insisted in an interview this morning.

Gabb noted the grizzly bear shot near his home five years ago – an incident that set him on fire – was killed in the fall while it was digging for roots.

“Bears come down and dig for roots in the fall.”

Some hunters eat black bears, but most grizzly bears are shot for trophies to hang on the wall so hunters can tell their grandkids a great tale, he said.

Gabb said there is absolutely no sport involved in hunting a bear while it’s lazily feeding along the highway.

The 30-metre corridor from the centre-line is also largely ineffective, as the cleared right-of-way along many sections highway is wider than 30 metres, he said.

“I guess to start with, I have to quote (John) Diefenbaker,” Gabb said.

“This broth has as much substance as a broth made from the shadow of a starving pigeon.”

Comments (9)

Up 1 Down 1

Earl Camenbert on Nov 6, 2014 at 5:23 pm

So, ask yourself...how many bears have been shot and killed in Whitehorse by game branch, because of garbage. Because we don't look after our messes, because we haven't done the work to our residences or farms to keep it bear proofed.
Now we are going to have chickens in back yards..bears like that too.
Garbage and human negligence has killed more bears in Whitehorse, than any hunter along a highway in the Yukon as a whole.

Up 6 Down 12

Salar on Nov 4, 2014 at 3:58 pm

It's almost a non issue....like lightning strikes or holding the door for elders...it doesn't happen often in plain sight .....but boy when it does it becomes the urban legend...."and out of the blue.....bam....the fish and game member murders the bear we were making nervous with our flashbulbs and whistles of 'look over here', while it was minding it's own business in a ditch in the Yukon....that metropolis of the North with people behind every bear berry bush"
Those poor sentient beings get set on a pedestal and then reality hits when one kills a person...twice in the Yukon this year. (Don't get me wrong, it's their bush and we are the visitors and they are wild animals so for that reason very unpredictable).
Anyway since viewing a hunter (or whatever the huggers call them) killing bears in the ditch would be akin to winning the lottery, we need a wholesale change to Law and philosophy....otherwise we're not being unreasonable enough.

Up 17 Down 11

Sabine Almstrom on Nov 3, 2014 at 9:38 am

I fully agree with Ken Gabb and Dave's comments. Bears need to be protected from roadside hunting, period. All bears, and in all seasons. Bears are icons of the wildness of the north, and people travel here from across the globe to view them. Most of them will only ever have a chance to see a bear near a road. And locals equally love watching bears along the roads.

Neither the bears, nor the bear-viewing tourists and locals will benefit from the proposed regulation change.

To shoot peacefully foraging bears in cold blood from the side of the road is shameful, cowardly and the mark of a killer, not a hunter. Which it will remain, even if the killing happens after the bear leaves the ridiculous 30 m (98 feet) demarcation area, measured from highway center line, not even edge of road.

Let's take a real stand and not allow this weak, watered-down excuse of a "hunting ban" regulation. Yes, change is necessary, but it should be manifested in a comprehensive ban that makes all bear hunting near the side of the road illegal.

Who are the parties to the so-called compromise anyway?
How is it, that the will of a majority of Yukon residents who favor a real roadside hunting ban (as in: ban all roadside bear hunting) should be over-ridden and compromised by a minority of bear hunters? Where are the numbers that support such a "compromise" in a democracy where majority rules?

The Yukon Fish and Wildlife Management Board needs to change the proposed regulations to reflect true protection of bears from roadside killing (please do not call it roadside hunting).

Up 24 Down 7

BnR on Nov 2, 2014 at 12:22 pm

I've hunted all my life, and I would literally have to be starving before I shot anything off or right beside a highway/roadway. I don't need anyone seeing what I am doing, nor do I need to rub my "right to hunt" in others faces.
So besides this issue, when is the YFGA going to start representing Yukon hunters rights in the face of outfitter pressures, like what happened out of Mayo and Faro this fall?

Up 27 Down 14

Dave on Nov 2, 2014 at 8:53 am

I can't believe this is even being debated. Ask a tourist what the highlight of their visit was and often as not it is 'seeing wildlife'. The government spends millions a year marketing to attract tourists, First Nations are starting to invest in tourism and private businesses are also investing millions to handle tourists. Are we really debating whether the interests of a few individuals who want to shoot bears from the road over-ride the interests of the thousands who make a living from toursism plus the thousands of locals who get pleasure from seeing a bear by the side of the road?
The fact that the most restrictive option in the 'compromise' is only a 30m buffer is also a joke.
Go back a couple of hundred metres in the bush if you want to hunt a bear. Shooting one in a man-made clearing makes you a farmer not a hunter.

Up 22 Down 11

Mark Smith on Nov 1, 2014 at 3:47 pm

“We do not support a wholesale roadside ban like this, the association would not support it."

Its unfortunate that Mr. Zealand is taking a position for what seems to be fear that YF&GA members will not support him. What he should be saying is that he wants his children and grandchildren to see how we can live with wildlife and view them as species that share our environment. Hunting trophy bears is not progressive, its unfortunate that Mr. ZeaIand is unwilling to initiate change. I guess that is why they call themselves a "game" and not a "wildlife" association.

Up 26 Down 14

bobbybitman on Oct 31, 2014 at 10:33 pm

Unbelievable. Even the president of the Fish and Game Association says that this pathetic 'compromise' is not going to stop them from killing bears that they see alongside the highways.

This is not a compromise, it's a joke. 30 meters from the center line of the highway, 'in the spring', grizzlies only, on 'numbered highways'. That's it. Considering that the highway itself is probably 10 meters wide per side, that is a 'protected area' of 60 feet per side of the highway.

What is wrong with people? I supported the Fish and Game people when they complained that they were not being flown out to certain areas due to outfitters wishes, but apparently the 800 to 900 members of the Fish and Game club could not care less about anyone but themselves. I'll keep that in mind next time they need support with an issue. Talk about massive selfishness.

And as for this joke of a proposal, take it from Gord Zealand. They are going to kill the bears anyway. They will 'wait' until it is 'out of the protected zone'. But they WILL kill that bear. So there's your answer. This 'compromise' is a useless gesture.

Up 42 Down 10

Mike Kohler on Oct 31, 2014 at 9:58 pm

I have to agree with Ken Gabb, and I hate to say this, but I have changed my view on roadside hunting of bears [any big game] especially this fall, after a grizzly, which my family knew and photographed as a non-problematic bear was shot by locals, while feeding on roots for several days along the highway at Fox Lake. This bear was minding his own business rooting around our lot and the area for the last three years and to a point predictable. No, I'm not saying that bears are ever predictable, but in my opinion there was no reason to get rid of him for neighborhood safety. This grizzly will be replaced next season with a different bear, with totally unknown behavior.
I'm a meat-hunter myself, but I see no justification of making a mess out of a precious animal in view of other people along a highway. I would never shoot a bear, except for self defense, and think if hunters would shoot wildlife with a camera once in a while, and study the animal's character, they'd probably change their attitude in regards of highway hunting. I think these folks who insist on highway-ditch hunting are like the odd folks who clear their throat and noses unto city sidewalks. I find them disgusting.
The Yukon Fish and Game Association needs to reconsider their opposition to roadside hunting bans.

Up 29 Down 18

Mark Smith on Oct 31, 2014 at 5:15 pm

I agree with Ken Gabb, this proposal should also involve black bears and cover all seasons.

Not long ago Canada faced an issue of blood stained ice flows off the Atlantic coast. Look at how a barbaric seal hunt was perceived across the world. If we protect bears along our roadsides Yukon will be percieved as a great place to travel and observe coexisting wildlife- lets think this through and make it happen, lets be progressive.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.