Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Premier Darrell Pasloski

Premier’s address lures some lukewarm reviews

Where the other leaders focused on fostering good relationships with First Nations governments,

By Sidney Cohen on September 30, 2016

Where the other leaders focused on fostering good relationships with First Nations governments, the premier talked about opportunities for Yukoners more broadly in his speech to the Yukon First Nations Chamber of Commerce on Thursday.

And some who attended the lunch-hour talk said that was unfortunate.

“At the very beginning of our luncheon series, there was a very strong focus towards building that relationship with First Nations. Today, we never really got connected in that same sense,” said Peter Johnston, the grand chief of the Council of Yukon First Nations.

The premier spoke about supporting small businesses and creating jobs for Yukoners in general, but said little about building relationships with First Nations people and governments, said Johnston. It’s these relationships, the grand chief stressed, that are key to a prosperous Yukon.

“Each mine is in the back yard of a traditional territory of a particular First Nation and First Nation governments, regardless of whether they’re recognized under the agreements,” said Johnston.

The grand chief said he wants assurance that his citizens will be offered jobs and training, and will be involved in planning.

“Unfortunately, it was not a lot of focus to Yukon First Nations,” he said.

Darrell Pasloski’s speech was in stark contrast to the Liberal leader’s last week. Sandy Silver laid out several concrete plans to involve First Nations governments in the decision-making process.

For one, he promised to meet with all Yukon First Nations chiefs in his first 30 days in office.

For another, he vowed once again to accept the recommendations made by the Peel Watershed Planning Commission in 2011, which would protect 80 per cent of the Peel region from oil, gas and mineral developments.

The current Yukon government wants to develop a much larger portion of the Peel, First Nations and Environmental groups want the watershed preserved.

Pasloski made no mention in his speech of the Peel, the fight over which has moved all the way up to the Supreme Court.

Nor did he mention Bill S-6 – changes to the Yukon Environmental Assessment Act that were made by the Harper government, and supported by Pasloski’s government.

Three First Nations governments said S-6 violated their land claim agreements, and filed a lawsuit in the Yukon Supreme Court.

Indigenous and Northern Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett said the federal Liberals would repeal Bill S-6 this fall.

Eric Fairclough, chief of Little Salmon-Carmacks First Nation, was at Thursday’s luncheon.

He expressed disappointment over the omission of Bill S-6 from the premier’s speech. Little Salmon-Carmacks is one of the three First Nations plaintiffs in the S-6 court case.

“There is a record that the Yukon Party has over their years in leading the government of Yukon and some of them have not been so good when it comes to First Nations relations, particularly when it comes to the amendment of the Environmental Assessment Act,” he said.

“Of course, there was no mention of that.”

It’s good, said Fairclough, a former NDP and Liberal MLA, that the Yukon Party wants to work with First Nations development corporations, but it’s not enough.

“There’s not a deep enough recognition about how much First Nations contribute to the economy in the Yukon,” he said.

“The government needs to be working more in involving First Nations into those types of decision-making.” 

In his luncheon speech, Silver said he would hold Yukon Forums, meetings of Yukon and First Nations government leaders, “up to four times a year.”

This suggests the Liberals would organize the forums more often that the Yukon Party, which has held one Yukon Forum every other year since 2012.

When asked whether he would schedule Yukon Forums more frequently if re-elected this fall, Pasloski said that “what’s even equally or more important is informal conversations that happen,” and that, “we don’t send out a press release every time we pick up the phone and we talk amongst ourselves.”

To media afterward, Pasloski said his speech to the chamber was intentionally centred on business.

“The theme of my speech was about our clear vision for the future and how together we can continue to grow an economy that creates jobs for Yukoners, keeps life affordable for Yukoners,” he said.

The premier raised the carbon tax in his talk. It’s an issue that’s sure to generate heat in the upcoming election.

“There is no single issue that will have a larger negative impact on your business or your community than a carbon tax.”

He said such a levy will make the cost of living and building in the territory more expensive, thus making it harder of local companies to compete against bigger ones from the Outside.

“Both of the leaders you have already hosted at these lunches are committed to bringing in a carbon tax,” he said in reference to Silver and the NDP’s Liz Hanson.

The premier asserted that he’s the only one who will stand up to Ottawa on this issue, despite numerous reports that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau intends to place a minimum price on carbon nationally ahead of the United Nations climate conference in November.

Pasloski appealed to small business owners in the room:

“I raised my children while balancing the demands of my clients and customers,” he said.

“I have lived through tough times when you wonder where the money to pay all the bills is going to come from. I’ve laid awake at night, wondering how I am going to protect the jobs of my dedicated employees.”

His experiences, he said, have given him “a great deal of respect” for small-business people.

The premier made a number of campaign promises not directly aimed at First Nations, but at Yukoners in general.

If re-elected, he would build a long-awaited redundant fiber optic line up the Dempster Highway, he said.

He promised incentives to spur growth in the IT sector, but did not get into detail.

He pointed to a recent deal with the Yukon’s Total North and Northwestel Inc. to bring faster Internet to government buildings and schools in Carmacks, Watson Lake and Teslin as an example of his government’s commitment to improve connectivity in the territory.

“When the children in those communities benefit from high-speed Internet in the schools and when seniors can see faraway specialists on telehealth consults, we will know we have succeeded,” he said.

He promised to overhaul the procurement process and adopt all 37 recommendations that came out of a critical report by a procurement review panel in May.

Pasloski ended by saying that he had done some learning in his last five years in office.

“Life is like business,” he said.

“You set out with excitement and bold intentions. Along the way, reality kicks in and you find yourself facing challenges you never expected.

“That was me five years ago, and it will be the same for anyone else that sits in this chair for the first time.”

See related stories below.

Comments (19)

Up 9 Down 3

Reality check on Oct 6, 2016 at 10:42 am

The economy of the Yukon is dependent on Government. 83% of every expenditure that the Yukon Government, makes, comes from revenues from the federal treasury.The reason that Whitehorse is booming in housing sales and the service industry, is because of the large number of government employees that live in the capital [ YTG, Feds, and FN] and government expenditures that happen in this community.

So please do back off the rhetoric about economic doom and gloom IF the Liberals, NDP or YP get elected.

The key point is, are there better more effective, smarter ways to build on the cartloads of cash that flow into YTG every year from the federal government. And that has increased to $947,000,000 in fiscal year 2016/2017.

Please do look at the transfers to Yukon over a 10 year period by following the link below:

http://www.fin.gc.ca/fedprov/mtp-eng.asp#Yukon

Up 8 Down 16

You know that the liberal and NDP have no economic plan for the Yukon. on Oct 5, 2016 at 2:06 pm

Neither party has advisers that understand economic development but only take the blame game forward. As my grandmother said, it is easy to call someone down but it take a real person to stand up for what they believe in.
Liz and Sandy have no understanding of how to develop the economy in today's world.
They have their people out their pushing buttons to try to cover up the facts of continued failure by past liberal and NDP governments.
Look at the Faro mess and the hospital building for seniors, not even opening under the NDP.
Look at the liberals, my way or the highway and fell apart from inside and it will again because the lack of direction for the Yukon for Yukoners to buy into.
Mining will come back but now the Liberal government has created a crises in Canada and especially for the Yukon.
Under the Federal conservative government the Yukon grew a lot and now we are certain to fall under a negative fault blaming, no substance liberal government.
NDP are out of the game all together. It is between Yukon Party and liberals.

Up 1 Down 4

BNR Yukon lose $200 million dollars a year to Alberta, BC and Alaska. on Oct 5, 2016 at 1:55 pm

If that $200 million year was spent in the Yukon over 40 years it equals 15000 thousand jobs.

Up 11 Down 4

Rose Delanor on Oct 4, 2016 at 6:47 pm

This is going to be a very hard election.

While I think the Liberal bloom is off the rose nationwide,, it doesn't mean I am going to vote Pasloski or YP in again.
The current sitting government is a bad government. I strongly feel we need to get every single YP repeat out.

Personally, I don't want another government to have a majority. The people always pay when we are running a dictatorship.
Hard decisions for voters. I am afraid that because no one is coming out a 'favorite' that people just won't vote. Which is another kind of statement eh?

Up 8 Down 6

ProScience Greenie on Oct 4, 2016 at 12:19 pm

Not a conservative fan myself but it is hard to find too much fault with Groucho's post. Some things to respectably disagree with but the post is rational and intelligent which is as far away as you can get from the words of most Trump supporters. Of note in his post is the observation that many in the non-conservative camp(s) use fear, exaggeration and outright lies exactly as so many Trump and other far right supporters do. Groucho also points out the legitimate concern that Silver, if his party wins, might say 'how high' when Trudeau says 'jump'. Pretty much what Paz did for Harper and that is wrong for any territorial government to do. There is nothing scarier than blind loyalty to your political party of choice. Even more than the Opposition, we have to hold our own party's feet to the fire and keep them in line which in the end helps to keep democracy strong.

Less rhetoric, lies and fear mongering would be nice from all party supporters this election but it's not looking good so far.

Up 22 Down 8

Moose on Oct 3, 2016 at 2:19 pm

@groucho
"With a year since the fateful federal election where the majority of the attending electorate got their wish, what have we got now? Outrageous debt that the Harper government tried to reduce"

What planet are you living on? The Harper government added $150 billion to the debt! How is that reducing it?! When they came to power in 2006 they were given a $13 billion surplus by the outgoing Liberals......and they burned through that BEFORE the recession even hit a few years later. It seems that you are telling people "Trump Truths" which have no basis in reality.

"trade deals where Canada gets the shaft once again. Is this the change you wanted Canada?"
You mean like Trudeau opening up Mexico for Canadian beef products? How dare he help out western ranchers like that!
Or fixing the canola exporting issue with China who was about to shut out Canadian exports worth billions each year? The nerve of those damn Liberals!

I wanted a more open economy, legalized marijuana, access to assisted suicide, an end to the terrorist witch hunt in Canada with that ridiculous snitch line the Cons wanted to set up, a cut in income taxes......so yeah, this change has been great, thanks for asking!

Up 15 Down 6

Bud Smith on Oct 3, 2016 at 12:46 pm

YESSSS - Groucho - let's "stand up to the Federal Government"

The one that gives the Yukon a BILLION DOLLARS a year in transfer payments

Up 23 Down 37

Groucho d'North on Oct 3, 2016 at 11:40 am

Harken back about a year ago when the air was thick with anti-conservative statements and rhetoric during the federal election . “It is time for a change” was the collective shout and folks would trot out their favorite issue to complain about and blame the Harper government as the Yukon Party government is being blamed now.
With a year since the fateful federal election where the majority of the attending electorate got their wish, what have we got now? Outrageous debt that the Harper government tried to reduce before the Liberals were given the keys to the cashbox and started handing out our money to other nations. Conservative policies for climate targets that the Liberals campaigned on changing have now been embraced by them because they cannot do any better.
The Liberals have introduced immigration practices with consequences that Canada will be dealing with for decades, trade deals where Canada gets the shaft once again. Is this the change you wanted Canada?
The same anti-conservative rhetoric is being spewed yet again for our coming territorial election, and what will this result in if the Liberals form government in the Yukon? You make your vote and you take your chances. My greatest concern is that the Yukon Liberals will be remote controlled by the Ottawa Liberals. Does Mr. Silver have the spine to stand up against the globalist promoter our Prime Minister has turned out to be in real life? Remember this is a five year commitment, not a test drive, so be sure before you choose for some kinda change you may not like later.

Up 23 Down 16

ProScience Greenie on Oct 2, 2016 at 3:51 pm

PEEL WATERSHED NATIONAL PARK

That is the only way to truly protect the watershed"s ecological integrity. If you love the Peel then demand a park. All the political parties and key players fail on this. Push them to create a park if you are sincere about saving the Peel.

Up 26 Down 6

BnR on Oct 2, 2016 at 3:06 pm

Wilf is at it again.
Which 15,000 jobs are we going to lose Wilf?

Up 49 Down 23

Richard Ablanalp on Oct 2, 2016 at 10:59 am

YAWN - the same tired old rhetoric from Darrell Drugstore scare the people with a pro-mining boogie man - refuse to address the major concerns of the people he represents - make no effort to make long term diversification of the economy.

It's time for him to buy a horse and ride off after Stephen Harper into the sunset.

Up 23 Down 54

Liberal leaders want to close the Yukon for any kind of resource development. on Oct 2, 2016 at 10:37 am

Liberal leaders support 80% of the land be closed to development. By supporting the Peel 80% will mean every other land plan will have an 80% clause in it.
This will mean a law suit on the multi-billion dollar crest project.
This will means billions of dollars lost to First Nations, Yukon, Federal and Municipal governments in the Yukon.
This will mean 15000 good paying jobs lost in the Yukon by the liberal leader's poor judgement.
Liberal leader's do not support oil and gas development in the Yukon and lets $200 million a year go somewhere else, which adds up to thousand's of good paying jobs to stay in AB and BC.
Under the Liberal or NDP the Yukon economy will die and we will see housing prices drop, retail sales good down, service industries will have to close their doors with more job losses.
The same as under the liberals and NDP before.
Look at how the population dropped under both the liberals and NDP government.
Only this time it will be worse.

Up 24 Down 27

Mark Sanders on Oct 1, 2016 at 8:40 pm

I think Darrell and the Yukon Party have done wonders for the golf course and his party built a few new things around town and in Yukon communities under their watch.
The golf course would have faltered without the generous support from the YP.

And we have more certainty after all the court battles and the government's perspective on the Peel and on oil and gas development and fracking. The YP did not hide, they took a stand and knew they would be unpopular as they stick handled through the Peel and S6 and consultation with first nation governments.

Up 41 Down 28

Just Say'in on Oct 1, 2016 at 2:09 pm

So why do we have a Native Chamber of Commerce? Why do you people figure that there should be special attention and money that is Race Based? Northerm just got many hundreds of Thousands of dollars from the Government and I new nothing of the availability of these funds, but would not have qualified anyway.

I am glad to hear the Premier talk to me. He is the leader of the Government that represents me. The Bands have their own Government. Their own funding. Their leaders negotiate with my leaders, but somehow they can still vote for mine but I can't vote for theirs. How is that equitable?

Up 42 Down 20

YTRes on Oct 1, 2016 at 9:00 am

"Pasloski ended by saying that he had done some learning in his last five years in office."
Well boy howdy, I guess he earned his salary then. I was worried we didn't get our monies worth.
However, shouldn't a premier come to office ready to govern? I mean, are you lying on the operating table and thinking to yourself "gee, I hope the surgeon learns something today".

Up 40 Down 42

jc on Sep 30, 2016 at 9:27 pm

For goodness sake already, does everything always have to be about the FN? The Yukon is made up today of multi races. Lets focus on them since they are all working and contributing to the economy of Yukon. And how much does the FN contribute to the economy of the Yukon? I've heard FN leaders say this before, but none have told us what or how much. Let's be more explicate. Don't stop at a meaningless statement.

Up 51 Down 30

Jack Colby on Sep 30, 2016 at 6:50 pm

HEY - DARRELL - PROTECT THE PEEL

HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TELL YOU ?

Up 48 Down 18

Rick Blandford on Sep 30, 2016 at 6:17 pm

Welllllll - Darrell did learn all about lawsuits

Up 67 Down 34

June Jackson on Sep 30, 2016 at 4:01 pm

"Pasloski ended by saying that he had done some learning in his last five years in office."

Really? What did he learn? Hmmm..how to delay an election until he gets his 50% severance pay? I don't know what he learned as opposed to what he already knew.. I'm pretty sure he already knew how to BS everyone.. I'm pretty sure he already despised seniors.. I'm pretty sure he already knew how to stick someone else with his travel the world expenses.. Oh..wait..he might have learned something about mining.. maybe not..he sure didn't learn anything about negotiating. And he didn't learn anything about FN either. He stood up and gave them a speech that I thought was kind of insulting. He had 5 years, and he decides today to tell them about procurement? FN know exactly what you are up to, and they probably won't vote for you either.

Frankly, I'm hard put to find anything he might have learned over the past 5 years. He should itemize it.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.