Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Premier Darrell Pasloski

Premier asked to apologize for ‘botched’ Bill S-6 affair

Territorial party leaders are calling on the premier to apologize for four contentious amendments made under his watch to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act (YESSA) under Bill S-6.

By Sidney Cohen on April 12, 2016

Territorial party leaders are calling on the premier to apologize for four contentious amendments made under his watch to the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act (YESSA) under Bill S-6.

Last Friday, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett was in Whitehorse to formally announce the federal government would revoke the S-6 amendments.

First Nations governments say the changes violated their land claim agreements and undermined the Umbrella Final Agreement.

NDP Leader Liz Hanson asked if Premier Darrell Pasloski will apologize for the “damage that his unilateral attempts to undermine (YESSA)” caused to Yukon First Nations, businesses and citizens, during question period in the legislature Monday.

“The premier refused to accept any responsibility for his government’s role in pushing amendments that violated the spirit and intent of the First Nations final agreements,” said Hanson.

“He continued to say it was Ottawa’s fault, but the responsibility is his and his alone.”

Pasloski once again shirked responsibility for the controversial amendments.

“(YESSA) is federal legislation for which the Yukon government has provided their comments and recommendations,” he said.

“The federal government now chooses to make further amendments to that legislation ... we will not be a barrier to those amendments.”

Hanson said that it was the Yukon Party government that suggested two of the amendments in the first place.

Indeed, when then prime minister Stephen Harper visited Whitehorse in 2015, he made it clear in front of a room full of listeners that the Pasloski government had asked for the changes outlined in S-6.

Liberal Leader Sandy Silver pressed the premier further to respond to the “mess” created by the four controversial amendments to the YESSA.

The S-6 amendments prompted three Yukon First Nations to take legal action against the federal and the territorial governments in 2015.

That lawsuit has been put on hold until the amendments are removed by the House of Commons no later than June 23.

At that point, it will be dropped, Chief Eric Fairclough of the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation – and a former NDP and Liberal MLA – told media last Friday.

“Ongoing court battles with First Nations and regulatory uncertainty have tarnished our reputation as a good place to do business,” Silver told Monday’s question period.

“A perfect example of this is the Yukon Party’s botched attempt to amend Bill S-6 or YESSA.”

“What role, if any will this government play in fixing this mess, one which this government created?”

Pasloski evaded the question.

Unlike Silver’s Liberals, he said, the Yukon Party is not hitched to any federal party, and “we will continue to stand up for the interests and priorities of Yukoners every day.”

The YESSA enshrines the process by which Yukon land is assessed for development.

The act is part of the Umbrella Final Agreement between Yukon First Nations and the territorial and federal governments.

Comments (7)

Up 13 Down 3

Salar on Apr 15, 2016 at 1:33 pm

Yukonborn and all rants and ravers....without transfer payments there would be no people here to support any business....learn to surf the establishment.

YESAA makes recommendations.....ok....it's up to the Decision Body (aka...the one who decides) to accept, reject or modify.

If the editor's need a kick so do the morons who can't understand what YESAA actually does.......I mean don't you want to know who's proposing to do things in and around your home?

Up 3 Down 12

Jonathan Colby on Apr 15, 2016 at 9:53 am

"Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act (YESSA) under Bill S-6."

Where the hell are the editors? My 5 year old knows how acronyms work, for mercy's sake

Up 3 Down 90

Yukonborn on Apr 15, 2016 at 12:38 am

What, does everyone think that Pasloski thought this up on his own? Did any of you self righteous do gooders ever think that there are other people that have a voice in this territory and are trying to make a living here NOT from the transfer payments that so many people rely on? And that maybe some of these amendments that YG put forward would help with the little guy trying to survive by ensuring timelines and a fair unbiased, consistent assessment process to which we do not have right now.
A proponent can submit the exact same application to three different DO's and come out with three completely different assessments over three different time periods, this is unfair to anyone that has to go through the process whether it be mining, agriculture, spot land app, highways, new subdivision….and needs to be addressed, and it was through a transparent review process where numerous amendments were put forth from the YP to the Feds representing the full gamut of views that were received.
Unfortunately the YN likes to take a Lib view and only tell the part of the story that fits its views. So, ya the YP submitted some amendments that FN's didn't approve of but all of industry needs, but it was the Feds and the senate that had to review them and accept the ones that they deemed appropriate. Why did the FN's disagree, because they are in a power struggle with the federal and territorial governments working with lawyers to battle their way to equal power on all lands settlement or not. Think about it, how will this work fairly if one person can vote for two governments and another person can only vote for one but each government has equal say on everything, recipe for disaster and this is not equal rights.

Up 145 Down 31

Richard Oziewicz on Apr 13, 2016 at 9:08 am

Typical of Pasloski. He takes credit for everything and no responsibility for anything. He can't admit to his mistakes. And we tax payers keep paying for one lawsuit after another. I'll be glad to see him go in this fall's election.

Up 8 Down 53

What the what? on Apr 12, 2016 at 8:31 pm

What is YESSA? Is she talking about YESAA? He "refused", "shirked" and "evaded"... Oh my, hard to take this seriously.

Up 10 Down 57

Sarah on Apr 12, 2016 at 8:28 pm

*YESAA. Get it right or keep a lid on it. Enough with the one sided reporting. Clear what side you're on, but at least learn the acronyms...

Up 122 Down 21

Yukon 1% on Apr 12, 2016 at 6:34 pm

Apology is alright, but they should reimburse the First Nation governments for any legal fees they incurred for having to defend the treaties that The Yukon Governemnt should have honoured in the first place.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.