Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Coun. Dave Stockdale

Next council’s members may be paid more

Next council’s members may be paid more

By Stephanie Waddell on July 7, 2015

City councillors elected in the Oct. 15 election could be covered for child care expenses if the current council adopts the proposed updated remuneration bylaw.

The bylaw is reviewed and amended each election year to take effect after the municipal vote for the new council’s three-year term.

It sets out the mayor’s full-time salary, remuneration for the six city councillor positions and other benefits and pay for the new council to be elected. It was brought forward at Monday’s council meeting.

Using the average annual Consumer Price Index increase of 1.5 per cent, the bylaw would see the mayor’s full-time annual salary increase to $87,942 from the current $84,100.

Annual remuneration for councillors would rise to $20,496 from $19,600.

The biggest change to the bylaw would be the addition of a childcare allowance for any councillors with dependents under the age of 13 living at home.

It’s proposed to be set at $10.30, equivalent to minimum wage.

It could be claimed for any council meetings, training or city functions where attendance by mayor and council is required.

Coun. Betty Irwin was quick to praise the addition of the new allowance. She noted it could make a difference for those with young children who are contemplating running for a position of councillor.

Veteran Coun. Dave Stockdale acknowledged he was fortunate that he hadn’t had to find child care for his kids when he had city business to deal as a councillor with while his kids were growing up.

Luckily, the city schedule had not interfered with work prior to his retirement as an educator, added Stockdale, who was first elected in 1983.

While he said it’s good to see an increase for future council members, Stockdale also questioned where the city may be in 100 years if such boosts continued to be approved for future councils.

“Somewhere along the line, something has to change,” he said.

As both Mayor Dan Curtis and Irwin noted though, it will be up to those future council members to decide on further increases.

“I have no problem with this,” Irwin said.

Speaking solely to the remuneration of councillors – recognizing the mayor’s role as a full-time job – Curtis pointed out members put in a significant amount of time serving the city.

Many devote up to 30 hours a week in addition to their full-time jobs and family responsibilities, to their roles on council, he pointed out.

A 1.5 per cent increase that reflects the rise in the CPI is “not outlandish,” the mayor commented.

The bylaw also sets out that the next council could consider remuneration for the following council after 18 months in office.

Barbara Walker, the city’s human resources manager, pointed out that under the proposed bylaw as well, the term “per diem” would be changed to “honorariums,” reflecting that they are additional payments for certain events rather than living expenses to cover costs, as the term “perdiem” would suggest.

The amounts for honorariums are not set to change.

They sit at $100 for extra qualifying business functions, events, meetings (outside of the usual schedule), training or if they are acting in the mayor’s place for periods of between one and four hours and $150 for events that are more than four hours.

Under the bylaw, councillors would continue to receive dental coverage, extended health care, accident coverage, life insurance and extended health care.

The mayor also receives similar (or in some cases increased) benefits as well as coverage for short- or long-term disability (though the mayor pays 100 per cent of the premium on long-term disability coverage).

The bylaw would continue to permit the mayor to take “paid personal leave as he or she sees fit.”

That means there is no sort of vacation pay-out for the mayor at the end of their term.

If adopted, the bylaw would come into effect for the new council on Oct. 27. Council will vote next week on whether to move ahead with it.

Coun. Mike Gladish was absent from last night’s meeting, with Coun. John Streicker attending by conference call.

Curtis has previously stated the city election could fall on the same day as the federal election (Oct. 19).

In fact, the municipal vote actually falls on the third Thursday in October (Oct. 15), as scheduled every three years.

Canadians will vote nationally on Oct. 19 as long as the fixed election date is kept.

As it’s noted on the Elections Canada website, the Canada Elections Act does not prevent the general election from being called at another date.

The chief electoral officer may recommend an alternate date if the fixed date “for polling is not suitable for that purpose.”

See related story.

Comments (5)

Up 36 Down 0

Wayne on Jul 9, 2015 at 4:50 pm

The rate of inflation, CPI, nor what public servants earn elsewhere should have any effect on salaries of cow employees. The sole factor is how much the city can afford to pay without raising taxes. The extravagant rates of pay must be financed from within the budget. This is taxpayer money. Nobody forces anyone to run for council.

Up 44 Down 3

June Jackson on Jul 9, 2015 at 2:15 pm

Hi YTer.. Don't know why you would ask personal questions on a public forum.. but, I am not in the wagon.. I am 74 years old working 2 extra jobs because my pensions don't cover my expenses although my rent is really high, I have been here many years and love my little home, I would rather work than move.

As to this council, they have driven us 800K into the hole.. I do not consider that competent management of City funds.
If the Mayor and Council were making 10.00, at this point in time I would consider that making too much.

Thanks for asking after me.. No matter what the content, I am always happy to see comments here. Upwards of maybe 5,000 people read these forums and 3 commented. I wish a lot more people were commenting on how that wagon rolls. I am glad you took the time to do so.

Up 8 Down 45

YTer on Jul 8, 2015 at 4:43 pm

June, take off your cranky pants.
What "huge hikes" in pay are you referring to? Like what, $800 pay hike for a councillor? And less than $4000 for the mayor?
Granted, $195 K as the top end of the pay range for the CM seems excessive, but I challenge you to run for council and put in the time many of the councillors do for what they are paid. Same with the mayor.
$87k and change for the hours our mayor puts in is pretty low. I bet Dan took a pay cut from his previous YG position to take on this role.
I'm not defending our mayors performance, which we can all vote on at our next municipal election, but for the mayor and councillors, they aren't making very much.
And as for your comment re. pulling the wagon, just what do YOU do to contribute to our city? Do you even work at all? Or you just sit at home waiting for the chance to make silly comments?

Up 45 Down 2

Here we go again on Jul 8, 2015 at 9:08 am

Once again, an example of how oblivious these folks are. Wasn't it just last week that an $800,000 shortfall was reported? I'd like to see how much other mayors and councils make, and what their salaries/per diems are based on. A quick google search showed salaries based on population, or on operating budgets for example. If the City staff won't do that type of benchmarking, maybe the reporters could to provide some context.

Up 79 Down 3

June Jackson on Jul 7, 2015 at 3:47 pm

Of course they will give themselves huge hikes in pay..outgoing councils always do. The City is only.. what.. $700,000 in debt now?

The City Manager is NOT worth $195,000 dollars a year.. you guys have rocks in your heads.. send her down the road with Crist and Fenwick and look for someone with more reasonable expectations.

So few of us are pulling the wagon, and too many sitting in it..

Pay increases at this time is just ludicrous.. Frankly, none of you are worth what you are getting now. This is what happens when we let people set their own wage... Any increase should have the approval of 75% of the tax base. And that goes for those *******s in YTG too.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.