Whitehorse Daily Star

MP has suspicions about NDP’s motives

Yukon NDP Leader Liz Hanson has challenged the Senate to hold public hearings in the Yukon

By Christopher Reynolds on September 18, 2014

Yukon NDP Leader Liz Hanson has challenged the Senate to hold public hearings in the Yukon — and called on MP Ryan Leef and Premier Darrell Pasloski to do the same — regarding proposed changes to federal legislation on environmental assessments directly impacting the territory.

The bill would replace an independent board with one led by a federally appointed chairman.

The Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board (YESAB) would also be subject to binding political direction, which could come from either the federal or territorial government.

“These amendments will have far-reaching implications for our territory, and the public deserves to be consulted on these changes,” Hanson said in a release Wednesday.

The official Opposition believes the proposed changes violate the collaborative spirit and procedural balance of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act (YESAA). That act stems from tri-partite agreements negotiated among First Nations leaders and territorial and national governments.

“The collaborative approach taken in the negotiations was meant to foster a co-operative approach to the important issues that arise when assessing the implications of proposed development in Yukon,” the party stated in the release.

“Many Yukoners have expressed their frustration that these amendments were tabled in the unelected Senate.”

Hanson, along with First Nations and environmental groups, said the proposed legislation’s final wording was drafted in secrecy after a meeting between the government and five industry groups.

“There’s been a lot of stealth around the process of change here,” she said at an NDP-hosted town hall meeting in Whitehorse last week.

“We know the federal government has met with sectors of the mining industry. But other sectors of society, they haven’t had any opportunity for provision of their input,” James Macdonald, the natural resources manager for the Council of Yukon First Nations (CYFN), said earlier this year.

He is also concerned about subjecting an arm’s-length body to political control.

MP Ryan Leef said Bill S-6, which today came before the Senate committee on energy, the environment and natural resources, balances the concerns of resource companies and pro- development politicians with First Nations and green-minded citizens.

“It’s a good-news story,” he told the Star today. “Both the Senate and I have spent a lot of time over the last while consulting with industry, government, the CYFN and individual chiefs.”

He noted 73 of 76 recommendations drafted in a five-year review were tabled in the legislation, now passed its second reading in the Senate.

“To that point of view, I think it’s reflective of everything that we heard. It’s bringing parity to our territory.”

Leef said he would always support holding local hearings — on this bill or any other — particularly when S-6 enters the House of Commons, where he sits as a backbencher.

But he scoffed at Hanson’s challenge in the wake of the federal NDP’s obstruction of parliamentary committee travel.

“The NDP have refused to authorize travel,” he said. “They’ve been playing this game since spring.”

In retaliation to the Conservative government’s rejection of cross-country consultations on its Fair Elections Act, enacted this past June, the NDP refused to authorize motions to permit members of parliamentary committees to travel for research purposes.

Leef said it was “ironic,” “disingenuous” and “rather rich” that Hanson “would stand on her soapbox in the Yukon screaming for the committee to come.

“She’s either completely out of touch with what her federal counterparts are doing or she’s using it as a prop,” he added.

Yukon Senator Dan Lang and the premier did not return the Star’s call by press time this afternoon.

The Yukon Conservation Society (YCS) is drafting comments to submit to the committee, said Lewis Rifkind, the group’s mining analyst.

A three-person steering committee reviews all comments submitted, and screens for “witnesses” to speak during public hearings, sometimes via video conferencing, a Senate clerk told the Star.

If the YCS wants to appear before the committee, the “request will be taken into consideration by the steering committee when it meets this week, and if the committee wishes to invite you to appear, I will communicate with you directly,” committee clerk Jodi Turner wrote in an email obtained by the Star.

The YESAA legislation would limit the amount of time groups would have to request more information from a proponent, although it would not curtail the time companies would have to answer.

Bill S-6, which also impacts Nunavut’s regulatory processes, further proposes removing the requirement for a new assessment when companies change their project. That would become subject to the board’s discretion.

The federal government says the bill is intended to produce more predictable and timely reviews, reduce duplication, strengthen environmental protection and provide meaningful aboriginal consultation.

“These improvements will result in further unlocking the economic potential of the North, while ensuring sound environmental stewardship and help the territories remain an attractive place in which to live, work and invest,” states a government release from earlier this year.

Industry supports the changes, said Samson Hartland of the Yukon Chamber of Mines.

He questions whether the bill would allow political direction of the assessment process.

“I don’t see that specifically in the amendment.”

The bill reads: “The federal minister may, after consultation with the board, give written policy directions that are binding on the board with respect to the exercise or performance of any of its powers, duties or functions under this act.”

The bill was introduced in the Senate instead of the House of Commons. It has gone through second reading in the upper house and came before an 11-person Senate committee this morning for possible revision.

Bill S-6 will still have to pass reading in the House of Commons, which could also hold committee hearings in the Yukon.

– With files from The Canadian Press. See letter.

Comments (8)

Up 3 Down 5

Committee set to Review Well not Work it should be done by Independent Body on Sep 23, 2014 at 10:06 am

The committee set up to review if the Yukon should permit fracking is not working and should be cancelled. What ever comes out it will not be creditable either way. So why waste tax payers money when the NDP do not want the process to work?

Up 4 Down 4

Sandy Helland on Sep 22, 2014 at 6:06 pm

Three things are wrong:
"The bill reads: “The federal minister may, after consultation with the board, ..."

Q1 How many First Nations are on that board?

"... give written policy directions ..."
Q2 Policy can be written, rewritten and written again until the "desired result" is crafted, without challenge.
Dictatorship -- of the minister.

"... that are binding on the board ..."
Q3 Sounds like a veto by the federal minister and bypasses the board. Feds get involved here.

First Nation government must be involved, included in the higher levels of governance.
This bill deprives a board its right to rule.
Better stated is: a minister will advise; the board will choose.

sandyhelland19@gmail.com

Up 10 Down 8

Putting Political Interest Before the People Interest on Sep 20, 2014 at 1:35 pm

Why do some parties put their political interest before the interest of their people? For example, the NDP have made it very clear that they do not support fracking in the Yukon but they have members on the committee to review the potential for fracking for natural gas in the Yukon. So NDP position and purpose to be on the committee is not to listen to the Yukon people because they already have made their decision and are trying to force it down Yukon peoples throats to use the committee process to stop fracking.
The NDP are a prime example of a party putting their political interest ahead of the interest of the Yukon people. All members of the fracking committee are supposed to be objective and fair in making the recommendations on fracking. This is also a very bias approach to governing. So does anyone want a government that is bias in their political beliefs and does not listen to the people of the Yukon?
What I am trying to do is to bring a realist approach to dealing with important subjects and the future of the Yukon. The Yukon Party has always been to prove business and creating a better life style and standard of living for Yukoner's and they have done that in the last 12 years. We have had steady growth of 2 to 3% a year since 2004. The liberals have not shown any position on anything so what can you say about them. The liberals have no position and no one seems to know what they want. The past leader of the liberals tried to call down the NDP and Yukon Party but you see where that got the last leader of the liberals. The committees working on fracking will not work because the NDP is making it a political issue, not if it is in the interest of Yukoner's to use the method of fracking as a sources of energy supply.

Up 13 Down 8

Made in the Yukon for the Yukon people keep jobs and wealth in the Yukon on Sep 20, 2014 at 11:10 am

Good piece NoDamm. Nailed it the NDP is against fracking and mining and want the Yukon to depend on the rest of Canada and not support ourselves. One NDP person came to my door this week talking about fracking. This person was not sure on fracking because that person had information that had one purpose to stop fracking. That person was more against the Yukon Party Government but using fracking as a wedge issue to gain votes for the NDP. What this means is trying to make case about new opportunity by using any means including putting out misleading information to confuse people. The NDP are just trying get voters all worked up hopefully use the fracking to change their votes in the next election. The NDP did this in Nova Scotia to win the election but voters saw through their actions and the voters removed them in the next election. Voters get the real truth and decide for yourself. The President of the United States is very left wing, some would labor him an NDP if in Canada. He supports fracking and now is stating that the US will be number one producer of gas in the world. The federal NDP is doing the same thing by trying to create wedge issues but it is back firing and their credit-ability is dropping.
Yukon voters are smart and can see through the tactics that are not in their the best interest for the Yukon. The Yukon people enjoy some of the lowest taxes in Canada. No sale taxes. That will be the first step the NDP will bring in in the Yukon. Second will be rent and price controls. Third will be sur taxes on anyone making over $80,000 per year. These types of actions have been the haul mark of NDP beliefs for many years. Look at history. They would kill the Yukon economy and send it backwards and we would lose investors, business and strong good employees, on and on. Look at the last time the NDP were in power in the Yukon our economy dropped by 6% and we had major failures of investment by the NDP including the waste of 15 million dollars in the Watson Lake saw mill project. The question I have for voters is do you like your life style and standard of living now? Then you have your answer on who to vote for in the next election.

Up 13 Down 19

Hold er right there partner on Sep 19, 2014 at 6:24 am

How does MP Ryan Leef consult with CYFN without them being aware of it? Was he using sign language? The Bill says yes there may be policy direction from the Federal Minister after consultation with the Board which will be binding. This would address concern from YCM who apparently missed this. I would much rather have an independent board than a rubber stamp from Ottawa calling the shots. Ottawa can't seem to wrap their head around consent of First Nations rather than consult as in Chilqotn vs BC Government ruling by SoC.This Bill is more flawed legislation that won't stand up in Court wasting ample tax dollars instead of being up front with people from the get-go.

Up 27 Down 14

NoDamnPetroleumYukon on Sep 18, 2014 at 7:57 pm

Hydraulic fracturing has become a big part of the Yukon NDP platform, and to a large extent is exemplifies their position on resource extraction for economic development.

The anti-frackers love to lecture us on how evil it is, though when asked, most don't know very much about it, but their social media friends say it's bad, so they do too. Anti-fracking defines who they are and makes them acceptable in their social milieu. They can't change their views on fracking, and they don't welcome any new data that challenges their preconceived notions.

It's ironic that they continue to consume the products and services that wouldn't exist without fracked petroleum wells. They use plastics, ride the transit, drive vehicles, ride airplanes, heat their houses and hot water... the list is endless; all derived from fracking to some extent.

They continue to consume products from countries that emit the greatest amount of toxic pollution and those evil GreenHouseGasses they believe are causing catastrophic GlobalWarmingClimateChange. Like with fracking, they're not sure about the details, but their farcebook friends say it's bad, so they do too.

The countries they like to buy stuff from contribute half of the world's GHGs that they're so concerned about. However the oilsands operations in the wilderness of Northern Alberta is evil because it contributes only 0.05% of the world's GHGs, not 50%. The countries that dump half the worlds GHGs are OK because they make their i-phones, their solar collectors, their windmills, and all that fabulously disposable crap they love to shop for.

There is a term for the condition when someone's actions are inconsistent with their stated beliefs; it's called hypocrisy.
In common terms it's called NIMBYism, ie. "it's tacitly OK, but Not In My Back Yard. You go frack somewhere else, not here".

They're also going to vote for the NDP candidate, no matter who it is in the next election, they're not sure why, but their friends say vote NDP, so they will.

Up 17 Down 19

Fred Statham on Sep 18, 2014 at 4:42 pm

Once again, The Harper Government and The Cathers/Nixon/Taylor Government are having a hard time with the concept of A Diversified Economy. Mining is Great and it brings the majority of Revenue to the Yukon Territory, but The Tourism Industry is growing exponentially each year too and it needs to be supported as well.

People from all over the world are not going to come and experience our Pristine Environment if Mining is going to Destroy It. A Fine Balance between Mining and Tourism is possible, but it takes EVERYONE to be involved in the process; another concept that the Harper- Cathers/Nixon/Taylor Governments have a hard time grasping.

Remember This: There are No Jobs on a Dead Planet

Sincerely, Fred Statham.

Up 35 Down 34

Yukon 2nd Nation on Sep 18, 2014 at 3:25 pm

Liz just wants to continue with roadblocks to economic development and keep on with the pick pocketing of taxpayers working in robust, self sustaining industrial provinces.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.