Whitehorse Daily Star

Counts show sufficient chinook for spawning goals

Enough Yukon River chinook salmon have crossed into the territory below Dawson City to meet spawning goals and provide for an aboriginal food fishery.

By Chuck Tobin on July 28, 2015

Enough Yukon River chinook salmon have crossed into the territory below Dawson City to meet spawning goals and provide for an aboriginal food fishery.

The target to achieve an adequate number of spawning chinook in the Yukon ranges from a minimum of 42,500 to 55,000.

The sonar at Eagle, Alaska, near the border, put the run at 57,980 as of midnight.

Under the management strategy for this year, the Yukon Salmon Sub-Committee recommended to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans that no aboriginal food fishery be permitted until the count at Eagle hit 48,750, the mid-point of the spawning target.

Sub-Committee chair Pauline Frost explained this morning the committee recommended late last week that an aboriginal food fishery be permitted.

Frost said four First Nations have asked Fisheries and Oceans for a conservative allocation while others are continuing with a voluntary closure.

The numbers say there is room for a small harvest, Frost said.

Resource manager Mary-Ellen Jarvis of Fisheries and Oceans said today while opportunities are open for the aboriginal food fishery, First Nations have been asked to take just 10 per cent of what they would normally take.

Four First Nations have indicated they’ll have a limited fishery while others have indicated they will not go fishing, she said.

Jarvis said at this point, there is no provision for a commercial or sport fishery.

While the run has passed the upper end of the spawning target, the Yukon is still bound by an international agreement to manage its harvest within certain parameters, Jarvis explained.

“I guess the bottom line is there is a small allocation to First Nations when you consider the international harvest agreement,” she said.

“And the First Nations are working with us in order to meet that obligation under the international agreement.”

Salmon scientist Stephanie Schmidt of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game said today she expects the final count past the Eagle sonar will end up somewhere between 65,000 and 70,000 chinook.

The run is also looking more normal and better than last year’s in terms of the female to male ratio, with an estimated 44 per cent female and 56 per cent male, compared to far fewer females last year, she said.

Schmidt said the chinook are also larger this year but they were expecting that because they were anticipating the run to be dominated by the older six-year age class.

Alaska again implemented strict closures for the subsistence fishery this year to help meet its treaty obligation of ensuring at least 42,500 chinook of Yukon origin reached the border.

Tight restrictions on both sides of the border last year resulted in the lowest aboriginal food fishery on record in the Yukon and the lowest subsistence fishery in Alaska on record.

The Yukon River chinook salmon stock has been in trouble for several years now, and nobody is quite sure why.

This year, salmon managers on both sides of the border were forecasting a total chinook run of between 118,000 and 140,000.

In years gone by, the total harvest would easily exceed 140,000.

Schmidt said they’ve already passed the low range of the preseason forecast as the run of chinook is all but over near the mouth of the river.

Alaska did allow for a short commercial harvest at the tail end of the run when most chinook of Yukon origin had gone by, as well as a short, restricted subsistence harvest.

Some Yukon First Nations have called for a full closure on chinook salmon for an entire life cycle of seven or eight years to enable the stocks to rebound.

Comments (9)

Up 10 Down 50

Groucho d'North on Aug 1, 2015 at 7:09 pm

I have strong misgivings of opening the salmon to ANY harvest including First Nations Cultural activities. For a while there I really believed that there would be some serious support for the future of the salmon by all user groups from harvesting the fish allowing them to build their numbers and gain their strength back as a species.
Allowing any group to harvest is the thin edge of the wedge to the end of the species. Its like uninvited sex- NO means NO. The salmon do not want to be screwed.
First nations have an opportunity to really demonstrate the claim they are stewards of the land....prove it!

Up 9 Down 64

Employee heads need to roll on Aug 1, 2015 at 4:10 pm

Salmon committee do your job please

Up 26 Down 0

Lawrence Bredy on Jul 30, 2015 at 10:10 pm

The fishery needs years to recover from years of over fishing...period. I have an idea...close the salmon fishery (all species) on the Yukon River indefinitely until the stocks are obviously abundant, in the meantime learn how to actually "manage" the fishery, and then proceed with an actual management plan. What has been done to date obviously has not worked.

Up 15 Down 3

Yukon needs set up a salmon hatchery on Jul 30, 2015 at 9:32 am

Yukon needs set up a large salmon hatchery so more small salmon are created and let go.

Up 304 Down 504

We need to fire the manager for the salmon committee on Jul 30, 2015 at 9:29 am

We need to fire the manager for the salmon committee and put in a Yukoner that is trained to work with Alaska to bring back the stocks.
It will take years for them to come back.
Look at Haines Alaska's large runs of fish.

Up 44 Down 174

Yukon 56 on Jul 29, 2015 at 6:12 pm

Four First Nations have indicated they’ll have a limited fishery while others have indicated they will not go fishing, she said. Define limited, fishing to feed dogs is not subsistence.

Up 164 Down 301

Yukon Jon on Jul 29, 2015 at 11:41 am

I guess the bottom line will do... RIP Yukon Salmon!
This damaged fishery needs years of fishing closures .

Up 20 Down 1

Dee on Jul 29, 2015 at 12:38 am

No one knows why the salmon number are low........ Since you have an international agreement, dont you think you should find out why......... So the low numbers can really rebound? Its not the subsistance fishing....... So what is it?

Up 14 Down 52

Mark S on Jul 28, 2015 at 8:13 pm

After all the conservation efforts in Alaska, it would have been nice to see no directed fishery on Chinook salmon in Canada this year!
The net effect, please excuse the pun, may involve a loss of confidence from the US fishing counterparts.

There will be chum salmon available to catch why not be satisfied with them? And it's so late in the year for Chinook salmon that fishers will take females and soft fish that are often avoided in years of abundance and earlier fisheries.

Its no surprise that a fishery will take place in Canada but it's very disappointing. When will there be a 100% conservation effort for these incredible fish? I thought it was this year but that is obviously not the case.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.