Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

EXPRESSING CONCERNS – Teslin Tlingit elder Madeline Jackson and Duane Gastant’ Aucoin address the international Yukon River Panel on Wednesday in Whitehorse.

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Mary Ellen Jarvis, Stephanie Schmidt and Eric Fairclough

Chinook conservation still the order of the day

It will be another year of heightened conservation for the annual harvest of Yukon River chinook on both sides of the border.

By Chuck Tobin on April 16, 2015

It will be another year of heightened conservation for the annual harvest of Yukon River chinook on both sides of the border.

Yukon and Alaskan management staff on Wednesday told the international Yukon River Panel in Whitehorse that measures are being taken to ensure enough of the troubled chinook stock reach the spawning grounds.

While Wednesday’s agenda for the Whitehorse meeting involved mostly technical presentations with numbers and graphs, there were those who used the open microphone to emphasize the cultural importance of the chinook.

For 17 years now, Teslin Tlingit elder Madeline Jackson has not set a net for chinook.

She told panel members how her two teenage granddaughters in the audience are skilled at cutting fish, how they knew how to clean and prepare fresh water fish from the lakes. But they’ve never cleaned a chinook salmon, she said with regret.

Jackson said there must be a continuing united front to revive the chinook stocks, a front so strong the whole world will take notice.

“My mom used to say, ‘take what you need, do not take it all, because there are some people coming behind you.’”

The 12-member Yukon River Panel is a joint Canada-U.S. management body that meets twice a year to receive technical input and discuss conservation and harvest strategies.

It began meeting in Whitehorse last Sunday. Wednesday and this morning were the only sessions open to the public. The meeting was scheduled to conclude this afternoon.

Alarm bells over the rapidly shrinking annual migration of chinook salmon have been going off for years. But the urgency has become louder in the last couple of years.

So much so, Alaska almost eliminated its passionately guarded subsistence fishery last summer, and the aboriginal food fishery in the Yukon was non-existent.

In the summer of 2011, for instance, Alaska’s subsistence fishery harvested 40,211 chinook, according to records.

Last year, it took 3,281, and even those were incidental catches while fishing for other salmon, along with chinook caught in research test fisheries.

In the summer of 2011, the Yukon’s aboriginal food fishery harvested 4,550 chinook, down 3,000 or 4,000 fish from the annual harvests of a decade earlier. Last year, the aboriginal fishery took 100, mostly for ceremonial purposes.

Chief Eric Fairclough of the Little Salmon-Carmacks First Nation described how the Northern Tutchone of the region were culturally linked to the chinook.

Today, he told the panel members, their traditional fish camps are being overrun with willows because nobody’s using them.

And yet, his First Nation is in a constant battle with government over development proposals that have the potential to do significant harm to whatever salmon stocks remain, the chief said.

Fairclough they’re now facing the Yukon government’s Next Generation Hydro project. It’s a proposal to identify a site and develop the territory’s next major hydroelectric dam, a proposal that will inevitably have a significant impact on salmon stocks, he said.

Duane Gastant’ Aucoin of the Teslin Tlingit Council told panel members one of the 10 potential sites calls for a dam across the Teslin River.

Thirty per cent of Canadian salmon use the Teslin River, he said.

“We met with the Next Generation Hydro people and said, ‘are you nuts?’”

Aucoin assured the panel the Teslin Tlingit Council will continue its fight to protect salmon stocks.

He thanked all those along the Yukon River who made sacrifices by not fishing for chinook last summer.

“The Teslin Tlingit Council would still like to see it happen again this year, and for the entire cycle (chinook life cycle of seven or eight years),” Aucoin said. “What was started last year, shutting down the fishery, we need to keep doing that at least for one cycle.”

Alaska scientist Stephanie Schmidt put up numbers Wednesday showing how the return of chinook salmon of Canadian origin would routinely hit 160,000 fish or higher in the 1980s and early ’90s.

In the last decade, however, the annual migration of Canadian chinook has plummeted, and was at an estimated 64,773 last summer, she explained.

Schmidt estimates this year’s total run of Canadian chinook will be between 59,000 and 70,000.

Scientists on both sides of the border acknowledge they don’t know exactly why the chinook salmon stocks are in so much trouble.

Though they generally agree the problem goes well beyond just harvest levels, and are likely associated with changing environmental conditions.

Alaska will again be implementing chinook fishing closures and rigorous conservation plans to fulfill its international treaty obligation of ensuring at least 42,500 chinook reach the Canadian border, Schmidt said.

She said Alaska’s harvest of 3,281 last year was the lowest on record.

For the most part, Alaskan communities who rely on the chinook for food are still in full support of tough conservation measures, though that support is not as rock solid as it was last year, Schmidt told the panel.

Mary Ellen Jarvis of the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans told panel members conservation will also be a priority on the Canadian side.

But until officials have had a chance to discuss this summer’s approach with Yukon First Nations, she said, she isn’t able to say exactly what the management plan will look like on this side of the border.

The harvest of an estimated 100 chinook last year was also the lowest ever, according to available records.

Jarvis said the harvest that did occur was mostly for ceremonial purposes.

With no targeted fishing for chinook in Alaska last summer, an estimated 63,431 crossed into the Yukon, all but 100 or so reaching the spawning grounds.

The estimated spawning escapement of 63,331 was the largest in five years.

The spawning escapement in 2013 was 28,669, well below the minimum spawning target of 42,500.

Comments (8)

Up 4 Down 1

Stu Summer on Apr 21, 2015 at 5:32 pm

It's interesting that DFOs Chinook estimates from tagging were actually an underestimate of how many of these fish were getting into Canada. It is rare for a tagging program to underestimate runs.

The ocean conditions in the Bering Sea have changed dramatically from warm to cool years, El Ninos and La Ninas. Yukon Chinook stay in the Bering Sea.

What has caused the decline? Weather and climate change and the continually fishing down of the larger sized fish by large mesh gillnets. To some extent management on both sides of the border have not responded very quickly to a number of environmental changes, gear changes and stock size changes. Only in the last few years are managers and the fishers in Canada and Alaska serious about turning things around. And it will work over time if the marine environment is favourable.

Dams are not usually a good thing for migrating fish but a single dam on a river system with adult salmon passage upstream and screens or protection for juvenile fish moving downstream can usually work for salmon but perhaps not so well for other fish species. Imagine adult whitefish going downstream though turbines.

If Alaska and Canada guarantee that about 65,000 to 70,000 spawn each year in Alaska and Canada and if there is a healthy sex ratio I would bet that we would see really positive results in 8 to 12 years.

Up 63 Down 27

Salmon counts from Alaska are down for years on Apr 21, 2015 at 8:49 am

The Yukon is not getting their share of the salmon because Alaska is keeping them and the salmon committee and Yukon and Federal Government are not holding Alaska accountable for their actions.
Every year for a long time salmon counts coming out of Alaska are down. That is the simple fact of it all. Remove the salmon committee, especially the staff because they are not doing their job.
Put in place a science based and regulatory group to deal with the Alaskans.

Up 40 Down 31

Blowing smoke on Apr 21, 2015 at 8:37 am

I grew up by four dams and have looked at the benefits of dams and wild life and fishery, existing stocks especially. Europe has had dams for 100 and 100's of years. If built properly they help fish stocks greatly. I think you are too closed minded by your statement and need to get some facts based on facts and science.

Up 47 Down 39

The Salmon against the world! on Apr 19, 2015 at 2:40 pm

There is not any one thing to blame for the decline of the Salmon. Everything from mismanagement by the department of fisheries for inaccurate populations, allowing too many people to fish the resource, allowing too much pollution in water, allowing the Yukon queen(s) to kill fish for years, allowing placer mining to clog spawning streams with silt for generations. Too much fishing in the oceans, rivers, lakes. Damming rivers has never helped anyone who says it does is blowing smoke. All these things have contributed to the decline in salmon returns, of course the one common element in all of them is us humans!!

Up 53 Down 29

The salmon stocks are down because of over commercial fishing in Alaska not the dam on Apr 18, 2015 at 3:53 pm

The salmon stocks are down because of over fishing in Alaska by commercial fishermen. Whitehorse dam has helped salmon because it removed some very difficult/dangerous waters and gave them a place to rest.
Properly constructed dams have have helped all types of fish stocks.
Fish habitat is important and can be improved by proper created systems.
In Nova Scotia they develop better sponging rivers conditions, US and Europe has done the same.
As long as the salmon pathway to their sponging ground is clear they can get there.
First Nations in the US have a lot of fishing programs to bring back fish.
Ontario has many programs and they have improved fish stocks.
There are 100 and 100's of dams built in Europe, US and other parts of the world not only for energy but for food production and the history of the properly built dam has improved for all species.
Have to understand cause and effect. Plus what most people don't realize, salmon go through cycles of up and down and it is natural.
The problem I have is people need to be properly shown how a good water system is developed.
Run of the river has its issues with fish fry and can be more damaging to a fishery then a dam.
Europeans are asking their governments to stop building wind farms because they are dangerous to wild life and humans especially the bigger bird like ducks and geese and for Yukon swans
Solar energy does give off a glare from the sun.
The Yukon needs to develop an education program for energy development so we can get a better understanding of the facts in our own back yard.
Mr. Aucoin I understand your point of view but there is a lot more to it than most of use know.
First Nations in NFL has agreed to one of the largest energy dams in north America and studied the development.
They looked at the up side and down side and their decision was based on what is best for all. They were given money to study the development.

Up 54 Down 53

Duane Gastant' Aucoin on Apr 17, 2015 at 2:34 pm

I hear stories from elders on the fish camps that used to be around the Marsh Lake area that no longer exist because of the collapse of the Chinook run there after the Whitehorse dam went up.
The salmon fishery also collapsed on the Columbia River until they started taking down dams to restore the health of the river & the salmon are slowly starting to return.
In the Scientific American there's an article about the downside of large Hydro dams.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-do-dams-hurt-rivers/
We should instead be focusing on more low impact energy production such as run-of-the river hydro, wind & solar combined.

Up 56 Down 7

susie on Apr 17, 2015 at 1:10 pm

Sea Shepherd did a long article on the impact of the Pacific herring-sardine industry, on salmon stocks and other sea animals. He believes the entire herring-sardine industry has to be shut down in the Pacific. I have been following Paul Watson for 27 years and believe he has more credibility in terms of what is really going on in the oceans as pertains to sea life, than any other source I have come across. You might want to google or contact him about this.

"many species of fish that also depend upon the herring, including wild salmon, aready threatened by pollution and the ecological destruction of the domestic salmon farms. These other species need the herring more than humans. For every can of sardines on the shelf in a super-market and every order of Kazunok (herring roe), an animal in the sea starves and dies." - Captain Paul Watson, founder of Sea Shepherd.

Up 86 Down 63

Hydro projects help Salmon if done properly. on Apr 16, 2015 at 5:21 pm

Whitehorse dam has taken out a dangerous piece of river and more salmon survive. The dam creates resting places for salmon.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.