Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Bylaw department aware of rules-flouting cyclists

The city’s bylaw department plans to continue downtown patrols

By Stephanie Waddell on August 15, 2014

The city’s bylaw department plans to continue downtown patrols and educating cyclists to keep city roads and sidewalks safe.

No changes, however, are being pondered in light of an incident last Sunday.

Carol Boschman, 70, was assaulted after she told a cyclist who “flew past” her on a Lewes Boulevard sidewalk that he’s required to cycle in the bike lane on the road rather than the sidewalk.

While RCMP continue to investigate the assault, Boschman told reporters Tuesday this wasn’t the first time a cyclist has startled her, whizzing past her on the sidewalk where she’s walking.

Despite a bylaw stating cyclists over the age of 12 are to be on the road, she’s noticed a large increase of both cyclists and skateboarders using the sidewalks. It’s a situation, she argued, that puts pedestrians like herself at risk.

Bylaw manager Dave Pruden acknowledged the department has received calls about cyclists on the sidewalks.

Officers are doing their best, he said, with two officers to spend half their time patrolling the downtown core.

That’s where there are the most conflicts between cyclists and pedestrians. Constables are also busy on the Millennium Trail patrolling for animal control and other bylaw offences.

“We do get complaints,” he told the Star.

Statistics provided by the bylaw department show so far this year there have been 50 warnings issued to cyclists and one to skateboarders. Those figures compare to 38 warnings for cyclists and four for skateboarders last year.

In 2012, there were 14 warnings issued to cyclists and none to skateboarders.

There have been no tickets issued to skateboarders over the last three years or cyclists this year.

Cyclists did get ticketed in 2012 and 2013, however, with 33 tickets issued in 2012 and nine in 2013.

Only six bicycles have been seized in the last three years – five in 2012 and one this year.

Meanwhile, the number of complaints has climbed by a few each year, with 20 coming in this year, 14 in 2013 and 11 in 2012.

While cyclists over the age of 12 must stay off all sidewalks in the city and wear helmets, there are no such regulations around skateboarding.

The only regulation for skateboarders is that they cannot be skateboarding in the city’s central business district, defined as Wood Street to Elliott Street and from Front Street to Sixth Avenue.

Elsewhere, Pruden said, they can “skateboard away.”

While the bylaw department doesn’t typically make regular patrols in the city’s more residential neighbourhoods such as Riverdale, he noted if it becomes clear there’s a recurring problem at a particular time of day, officers will attend.

They will first attempt to educate, then move to stronger enforcement measures if need be.

The city also provides pamphlets and online information, and has an officer visit city schools in May and June to remind students of the rules of the road when they are cycling.

“We try to do education first,” he said.

He also pointed out that in addition to patrolling for cyclists and skateboarders on sidewalks in the downtown core, the officers working on patrols are also tasked with a number of other duties such as patrolling trails by ATV.

“We do the best we can,” he said.

See editorial this website.

Comments (17)

Up 11 Down 1

DJ on Sep 4, 2014 at 4:00 pm

I understand last week that a young man while cycling through a crosswalk was hit by a vehicle. This was I am sure for his parents a very stressful occurrence and fortunately the young man was only slightly injured. The driver of the vehicle would stand to bear far great legal and civil liability than the young man, no matter the cause of the accident.
I have some questions for both the young man and bylaw. Was the young man in fact riding his bike across the crosswalk? Is it legal and not contrary to city bylaws to ride a bike in a crosswalk? Is a cyclist required to get off and push a bike through a crosswalk? Where was the young man riding his bike before the accident? Was he in the designated bike lane? Or was he in the shared pedestrian/bike path? Was he on the sidewalk? If he stopped before he turned, did he signal his stop? When he turned did he signal his turn?
Did this young man by his actions create a situation that could very well have ended tragically? Laws and bylaws are in place and should be respected. I recall riding in a car with a long ago girlfriend and her brother who was driving. He only had a learners permit and we were t-boned by some jerk speeding out of a parking lot. The driver who hit us was at fault but the brother got a ticket for having a second passenger in the vehicle other than the licenced driver.
My question to by law is if this young man was operating his bike without obeying city bylaws or the highways act, shouldn't he be charged?

Up 11 Down 19

Lenore Morris on Aug 22, 2014 at 9:46 pm

I both live and work downtown, so happily am able to walk a great deal, and to commute by bike in the summer. In 15 years in Whitehorse I have never been hit by a cyclist and rarely if ever even startled by one. By contrast, I have been terrified numerous times, and hit once, by car drivers. I get cut off regularly - including about once a week in a cross walk - by drivers who either are either blind to pedestrians or just don't care. My conclusion: Whitehorse does have a safety problem, but it's not from cyclists riding on the sidewalk.

Up 5 Down 4

anthony on Aug 22, 2014 at 9:02 am

This article should put things into perspective.

http://www.citylab.com/cityfixer/2014/08/tired-of-cyclists-riding-on-the-sidewalk-build-more-bike-lanes/375984/

Up 9 Down 22

Car driver AND cyclist on Aug 21, 2014 at 11:39 am

The ignorance displayed in some of these comments is mind numbing.

Most cyclists, especially in Whitehorse, also own automobiles. So next time you feel negatively towards someone riding their bike, remember they are paying as much as you are to maintain it AND they are having almost no impact whatsoever on the environment or damaging the infrastructure (which cars are). Plus they are allowing you to get where you are going faster by easing congestion and removing a single occupancy vehicle from the road.

The assailant was most likely using a bicycle because it is an inexpensive mode of transport for someone who can't afford a vehicle. So motorist who think bicycles should have licence plates, are you trying to further subordinate the poor and increase wealth division? Because that is about the only thing licensing would achieve.

Educating "cyclists" on the sidewalk is a waste of money and I can tell you that those cyclists who choose to walk on the sidewalk are not the typical self identified cyclist. They are on the sidewalk because they do not feel safe. Whitehorse infrastructure for cyclists sucks. Period. Give cyclists infrastructure and they will use it and a painted bike lane is bare minimum.

Up 28 Down 2

YA on Aug 19, 2014 at 6:05 pm

How did this assault turn into a story about bicycle bylaw enforcement? Some guy with poor impulse control lashed out and struck a woman. Seems to me that's the point here.

Up 18 Down 17

Just Sayin on Aug 19, 2014 at 3:03 pm

Just would like to ask, Who pays the road taxes? Maybe Cyclists should have to pay registraion fees for using the road, then we could sweep their section they are supposed to ride in and make it wider, but they don't pay so why should we make it all about them!

Up 27 Down 36

BnR on Aug 17, 2014 at 11:30 am

This will sum it up. How many pedestrians have been hit/injured by cyclists on sidewalks this past calendar year? Not startled, but hit or injured?
Now, tally up the number of pedestrians hit/injured by motor vehicles this past year.
If the question is the safety of pedestrians and the public in general, we would ban motor vehicles from downtown Whitehorse, but the reality is that this is just an issue about people who are bothered by people on bikes.

Up 28 Down 3

Groucho d'North on Aug 17, 2014 at 10:39 am

A fundamental problem we face in the Yukon is the ratio of policy wonks to enforcers at the municipal and territorial level. There are dozens of well-paid people creating new laws and regulations for we citizens to abide by, but only a few staff with the job of enforcing these rules to guide our lives. Are citizens expected to pick up the slack? Because some certainly have some difficulty living by these rules.
I witness numerous violations each day of people rolling through stop signs, making illegal turns, riding on sidewalks and otherwise violating the laws. If the RCMP and bylaw (not the ticket cops – they are doing an excellent job creating new revenue) got out of their warm comfy cars and did some real policing, many of these situations could be reduced, like catching that twerp with the motorized bicycle who is blazing through town ignoring all traffic laws. I’ve seen him numerous times, and I’m sure others have as well. Will it take a collision with a pedestrian for bylaw enforcement or the RCMP to deal with this frequent violator?
I know of four busy intersections that will see numerous drivers blow through a stop sign during the morning commute, and every day this happens, not just once in a while. If we regular folks can see these violations how come the trained peace officers cannot…or will not?
All too often we hear that there are not enough enforcers for the many regulations we have. 13 conservation officers to patrol all of the territory, only a half dozen RCMP in Whitehorse during a shift, if they have to process a DUI suspect that takes two of them off the road for a term. Perhaps more officers rather than policy writers would even things out a bit.
The political leaders pride themselves in passing new regulations for the well-being of the public, but without enforcement these advancements are of little value to anyone.

Up 41 Down 18

concerned citz on Aug 17, 2014 at 12:10 am

Cyclists are just plain annoying to drivers. They pretend they are a vehicle hence almost causing accidents and they hold up traffic. Also they fail to move safely to the side of the road when traffic is trying to proceed pass them. I am all for saving the environment but I don't think they should become priority on highways. Just plain ignorant.

Up 19 Down 4

Mike Smith on Aug 16, 2014 at 1:11 pm

Bylaw seems to go for education rather than enforcement for many infractions. If you call regarding atvs or trail bikes on non-motorized trails they often just log the call and respond after many similar complaints have been made.

I hope the guy in this situation is caught. I wish bylaw would put some attention at stoplights. Almost 50% of the time I see people run reds. lets stop this bad practice soon.

Up 21 Down 11

Josey Wales on Aug 16, 2014 at 7:58 am

Warnings? Funny we don't get warnings when the clock runs out on Sima piggy banks (parking meters).
So by-law is an educational dept. eh?
Awesome, maybe instead of receiving a paycheque for this "public service" we can give them nice happy accolades instead.
Nah...that is ridiculous, the education part...fine the jack asses or start "educating" those who actually HAVE to go into town, use Sima's piggy banks whilst supporting merchants.
Go flying by me on a bike closer than I care? They will learn what a road rash is.
Wanna dart out into traffic idiots, I'll lose very little if any sleep with that "education" in physics.

Oh yeah...new bridge modes aside, when my dogs and I are strolling, as Gandolf said..."you shall not pass" me and my livestock unless you're off your bike.

Up 38 Down 12

Denise G on Aug 15, 2014 at 9:30 pm

I have to license my cat and dog but cyclists do not have to have a license or a license plate? Not to mention proof of insurance? Or cyclist training? Why not if they are supposed to be modes of transportation. A license with picture on file might make tracking down this revolting man a lot easier.

Up 20 Down 40

Johnson on Aug 15, 2014 at 8:51 pm

Well, if the city bothered to sweep up the bike lanes now and again, and maybe added a few more, the sidewalk wouldn't be such an attractive target in places where traffic is too fast and aggressive to cycle in the street.

Up 38 Down 2

Joe on Aug 15, 2014 at 8:39 pm

You guys do not do the best you can. Just the other day I phoned by-law because I had some ignorant person block my drive-way. Not one bylaw person came, when I phoned back to ask what was going on and that I couldn't get in or out of my own driveway I was told everyone was in a meeting @ 3pm on a thursday. Can't you conduct meetings in the morning like every other business? I mean you should be out patrolling and enforcing the cities bylaws and not having a meeting mid-day. For someone to have a driveway blocked and then call the people who are supposed to rectify the situation and that does not happen?

Up 39 Down 7

Brad on Aug 15, 2014 at 6:43 pm

The city should make cyclist do a "safe cyclist test" and be required to have a license plate on their bike. I have to do the money scam safe ATVer and safe snowmobiler test. And lots of the questions don't even apply to operating in city limits. Tell me where in city limits I need to be aware of avalanche dangers and why I'd operate an ATV on schwatka lake in the summer. If I need a license and registration to operate a snowmobile and ATV on designated trails so should cyclists!

Up 11 Down 31

James bond on Aug 15, 2014 at 6:27 pm

That is stupid bikers don't belong on the road they belong on the sidewalk. Simple little rule to go by " if you can't go as fast as the speed limit displayed for cars then you don't belong on the road." simple as that. There is way leass damage that could happen if a pedestrian is hit by a bike, then a biker hit by a car or truck.

Up 40 Down 5

james kathrein on Aug 15, 2014 at 4:54 pm

My comment - what about those cyclists that ride down 2 mile hill when there are signs posted not to, they are a traffic hazard.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.