Whitehorse Daily Star

Bear killed while investigating culvert trap

A second black bear has been shot on the Chilkoot Trail as the historic Gold Rush route has been reopened to hikers but with strict conditions.

By Chuck Tobin on June 28, 2016

A second black bear has been shot on the Chilkoot Trail as the historic Gold Rush route has been reopened to hikers but with strict conditions.

The second bear was shot at 8 a.m. Sunday.

Parks Canada superintendent Jeni Rudisill said this morning information gathered since the first bear was shot a week ago indicate the second bear was also a potential problem, as evidence suggested it had become habituated to human activity.

The first bear was shot and killed along the trail at the Lindeman City campground at 11:30 a.m. last Wednesday.

It happened not far from a baited snare that had been placed near the patrol cabin broken into by a bear two days prior.

In response to the break-in, Parks Canada set up remote wildlife cameras to assist in the investigation. The second bear was captured by those cameras approaching the patrol cabin last Wednesday night, Rudisill said.

She said the bear was investigating the building and the window that had been busted through initially. When the animal was in view of people, it was not quick to leave, she pointed out.

It was shot Sunday while it was investigating a culvert trap that had been flown in, Rudisill explained, adding there’s been no bear activity at Lindeman since.

A necropsy was conducted on the first bear last Thursday to see if there was any evidence to confirm it was the bear that had broken into the patrol cabin, but the results were inconclusive, Rudisill said.

She said a necropsy is being conducted on the second bear to see if there is any evidence indicating it was the bear that had broken into the cabin.

DNA material has been collected from both bears. It will be sent out for comparison with fur and other DNA material recovered from the patrol cabin, she said.

The bear that busted into the cabin a week ago Monday received a substantial food reward.

There was concern it could pose a threat to hikers, as there were indications it had become habituated human food an activity.

Hikers on the Canadian side of the Chilkoot Trail were removed June 20 by helicopter and boat, and the trail was closed on the Canadian side.

After the first bear was killed, it was decided to keep the trail closed for another three days to let the scent of the bear bait used in the snare sets to dissipate. Then the second bear showed up.

The trail was reopened Sunday. Hikers, however, must travel in groups of no fewer than four, and each group must be equipped with bear spray.

In addition, hikers are required to watch the normally optional video Stay Safe in Bear Country at the Chilkoot trail centre in Skagway before their departure.

“These are always good travel practices, but we are making them a requirement at this time,” Rudisill said.

As part of the restrictions, dogs are now prohibited in the restricted area that runs from Happy Camp to Bennett.

Rudisill said the campground at Lindeman remains closed and the Park Canada bear management team is conducting 24-hour surveillance there to watch for more bears.

There are parks staff at each campground along the trail, she said.

Ben Hayes of the U.S. Parks Service in Skagway said in an interview last Friday of the 100 hikers who had their plans interrupted by the closure on the Canadian side, three-quarters were OK with hiking the American side only while others pursued refunds of the $55 trail fee.

Other than a group of hikers from Australia and another group from the Czech Republic, most were from Canada and the U.S., he said.

Parks Canada is recommending hikers check the Chilkoot Trail website www.pc.gc.ca/chilkoot for updated information if they’re planning to hike the Chilkoot.

“In the 30-plus years that we have had this facility, we have never had any wildlife damage a building or enter a building,” Rudisill said.

She said the bears were not siblings, and there is nothing to suggest they were related.

The first bear killed was a lean two- or three-year-old sow weighing 37 kilograms (82 pounds).

The second was an eight- to 10-year-old boar weighing 111 kilograms (245 pounds), which is also on the lean side, she suggested.

The bear that broke in busted through a pane glass window and ransacked the fridge and shelves of food. Remnants of the raid were found 50 metres from the cabin, she said.

Rudisill said steel shutters have now been placed over the cabin windows.

The patrol cabin is a sturdy, solid-wall building that serves as the primary facility and headquarters at Lindeman.

It’s one of two buildings where food is kept, the other being surrounded by an electric fence, she explained.

Comments (15)

Up 11 Down 1

north_of_60 on Jul 2, 2016 at 6:50 pm

The bears I've met are more reasonable than most humans I've met.
It's unfortunate that bears have to be sacrificed on the alter of human stupidity.

My dog and I will continue to hike where there are more bears than stupid, urban-hipster humans.

Up 6 Down 1

Josey Wales on Jul 2, 2016 at 10:11 am

Gee sure seems like "we" must behave and act better because?
Because it seems the do as we say not as we do crews tell us so.
Given the ridiculously unessasary death of two bears, over the top NEW rules for the peasants as a result.....
What might we NOW have to do to keep our shot guns and cash where it should be?
Do we need to have three others to witness our safe storage, have three witnesses count all stored cash, can I still bring my dog out using my shotgun, can I walk my dog when carrying cash?
Yes I know this post is ridiculous and redefines stupid, but so too does this string of events that led to two dead bears and over the top more "rules" for those who had JACK to do with the "chain of events" that created this crap.

I know that this is a federal park with federal 'crats and not YG...but the concept of no accountability no responsibility for THEIR actions....is omni-present.

Up 4 Down 2

ben on Jul 1, 2016 at 10:34 pm

I'm with Bear Aware here. My experience is that COs (at least the ones I've met) are all about changing attitudes and trying to avoid problems rather than reacting to them with a bullet. Cut's down their workload if they can get people to avoid problems with bears.......why wouldn't they try to get people to take action to prevent problems.

Up 17 Down 2

Just Say'in on Jun 29, 2016 at 10:00 pm

So now the Hikers have to travel in groups of four. Why, was this the cause? Now you can't take your dog. Why, was this the cause? No it was caused by you. Grow up and take something called personal responsibly, or don't they teach that in University.

Up 22 Down 0

Just Say'in on Jun 29, 2016 at 9:56 pm

"The bear that busted into the cabin a week ago Monday received a substantial food reward". AND "The bear that broke in busted through a pane glass window and ransacked the fridge and shelves of food".
Ok so who provided this reward? YOU DID. So who didn't have the food adequately secured? YOU DID. If this had been a hiker that had provided the "Parks Speak" Reward then they would have been publicly shamed by Parks Canada. Is this the way that you protect the Wildlife? Then you all need to find a new job.

Up 6 Down 5

Lost Hicker on Jun 29, 2016 at 8:57 pm

This is indeed a very sad Story. It seems like the Yukon Bear Police is once again protecting the very same People that actually would like to see Bears.
A 200 Pound Bear is not a manhunting Beast that should be killed. It should just live. Relocate it...I am sure all Hikers that do this Hike are aware of Bear activity along the Trail.. Some might even count on it. I have lived in Banff and Jasper Nat Parks and there was never a executive Order to kill a Bear on site.
They were always relocated. Why can't we do this here? By the way, I was working in a Camp on The Campbell Road from Watson to Faro. A little Bear walks in to my kitchen on my break and has a good feeding. I reported it to the Rangers in Watson Lake and they told me If you can shoot it then do it and I did. And that Bear I still see it in my dreams and it is not a nice one. Stop killing the Bears...RELOCATE.

Up 8 Down 1

Bear Aware on Jun 29, 2016 at 8:53 pm

@Mary, I disagree with your take on conservation officers. I haven't run across one that "can't be bothered." They're keen on educating people to not be over-fearful of bears and not to let that fear get in the way of experiencing the outdoors.

I do think they might be responding to the increased population and a different population (that is, more people who aren't necessarily in the north to be, you know, northern), as well as what seems like a busier bear/urban interface.

But this thing on the Chilkoot is troubling and really takes me aback. I doubt that the COs had much to do with it. My experience with COs is they strive to maintain calm, not exacerbate the situation.

Up 5 Down 10

Nature Lover on Jun 29, 2016 at 2:26 pm

Oh this story is just so bizarre, I really have a hard time understanding the decisions that have been made. I am so incredibly sad that not only one, but two bears were 'destroyed' (pretty harsh term).
My understanding is that it wasn't Conservation Officers that had the final word, but it was the Parks Canada Bear Management Team. Not sure who they are exactly, but I assume it was a Parks Canada official who said to pull the trigger. It's strange because I have had such great experiences hiking the Chilkoot Trail and exploring our beautiful national parks - the staff has always been nothing but amazing. I have lived here for many years and have nothing but good things to say about Parks Canada, except this issue with the two bears really bothers me...something just seems so wrong, and the whole story seems shady. Please, if there is a real reason why two bears were shot - I think our communities deserve to know. Were these decisions in consultation with CTFN, since it is CTFN traditional territory?
Thank you to the incredibly lovely staff who helped my friends on the trail - it's never the ones in the field that do the dirty work...

Up 13 Down 1

Salar on Jun 29, 2016 at 8:01 am

The article title suggests an industrial accident....killed while inspecting a culvert trap....but this whole story is confusing.

Up 14 Down 2

ben on Jun 28, 2016 at 11:16 pm

245 lbs......"on the lean side".....are you kidding.....have you seen a northern interior black bear before?.....that's getting on the huge side.

Up 12 Down 6

Disappointed Yukoner on Jun 28, 2016 at 7:02 pm

"The bear received a substantial food reward" "A necropsy was conducted but the results were inconclusive"
So even the guy in charge of the necropsy is incompetent! Pathetic.

Up 18 Down 5

Dave Smith on Jun 28, 2016 at 6:58 pm

Requiring a firearm would be more appropriate than requiring bear spray given that the very limited data from Herrero's 1998 study on bear spray showed that it was not very effective against curious black bears or food-conditioned black bears. Against (4) "aggressive" black bears, bear spray was darn near worthless. People would be much, much safer with an adequate firearm.

Up 10 Down 9

Mary on Jun 28, 2016 at 6:19 pm

I find the practice of "conservation officers" killing bears because they may be a potential danger is just a pathetic excuse for not being bothered to relocate these animals to another location! If you ask anyone about calling conservation officers to deal with bears or any wildlife, the answer is usually, "Don't, they just kill them". If people want to wander the wilderness, then they need to be very aware that wild animals live there and they, the people, are there at their own risk and not to expect animals to be put down so they are more comfortable in the wilderness. I live in a rural part of our city with bears in and around our house and property regularly. I keep all food and wildlife attractants away. I mentioned to conservation officers at an Outdoor Show about bears wandering around our house and of course their answer "call right away, we'll come out". I think not and told them so.

Up 10 Down 7

June Jackson on Jun 28, 2016 at 6:06 pm

I did predict this outcome for that bear. It seems to be a trend in the Yukon.. if it has 4 legs and you can see it..kill it..if no one is looking steal it.. if it doesn't belong to you and you can't steal it.. key both sides and the trunk, or shoot paint balls at it.. if you speak a truth, you are a hater or a racist... not a real nice place right now my Yukon..

Up 57 Down 8

Max Mack on Jun 28, 2016 at 4:54 pm

And here you have the untarnished truth about back-packers, hikers and other "wilderness lovers", who expect protection from their self-imposed risks by killing bears, wolves and any other predator that poses a potential threat. After all, can't have danger messing with their faux zen state . . .

Used to be farmers killing the predators, now it is eco-tourists and so-called "nature lovers" who expect the wilderness to be sanitized for their exclusive benefit.
All the while, they decry development of any kind. Especially mining and oil.

The hypocrisy and double-standard, in my books, is both astounding and sickening.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.